MARLVEL

Contrast vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Contrast's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Contrast
This App
Uber Eats: Food & Groceries
Nemesis
Kiosk App
Contender
Pizza Hut Indonesia
Contender
Caviar - Order Food Delivery
Contender
ChowNow: Local Food Ordering
Contender
BLW - Chinese Recipes
Peer
When Was This Opened?
Peer
Tare: Ingredient Converter
Peer
Blue Nile Injera
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperPumpApp Solutions ABUber Technologies, Inc.CRMBSARIMELATI KENCANA, PTCaviar, Inc.ChowNowMarco BerettaChristopher RomaniCameron McconnellBerhane Asbu Asmelash
CategoryFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & Drink
PlatformiOSiOSAndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOSiOSiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 54.8 / 50.0 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count010,498,7700163170,77725,0901111
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$0.99FreeFree
Release DateAug 5, 2020Mar 1, 2016May 19, 2023Jul 12, 2017Dec 4, 2014Jun 13, 2017Dec 6, 2019Jan 2, 2026Mar 26, 2026Mar 5, 2026
Last UpdatedSep 13, 2023Jun 29, 2026Jun 18, 2024Apr 16, 2026Jun 29, 2026Mar 24, 2026Mar 17, 2022Jan 2, 2026May 4, 2026Mar 6, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment---negativepositivepositive----
Score---35/10085/10085/100----
Praises---
  • Reliable delivery service with professional staff and warm food quality
  • Exclusive restaurant selection
  • Fair commission structure
----
Complaints---
  • Authentication failures prevent account access due to missing verification codes
  • High delivery fees
  • Inconsistent delivery tracking
----
Requests---
  • Expanded payment options including digital wallet integration for faster checkout
------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Direct venue integration reduces operational overhead
  • Low-friction interface for table-side ordering
  • Global logistics network provides consistent delivery density
  • Multi-category marketplace captures non-restaurant retail spend
  • Uber One subscription creates high-frequency user lock-in
  • Direct control over branding within the physical restaurant environment.
  • Zero commission fees for restaurants by bypassing third-party marketplace costs.
  • Integrated QR-based dine-in ordering reduces labor dependency
  • Proprietary menu items drive brand-specific loyalty
  • Curated restaurant partnerships create a premium brand identity
  • DashPass integration provides a proven recurring-revenue retention loop
  • Commission-free model aligns incentives with independent restaurants
  • 24/7 human support builds trust with restaurant partners
  • Brand positioning attracts value-conscious diners
  • Evidence-based BLW guidance provides high-trust value for new parents
  • Specialized Chinese cuisine focus creates a clear, defensible niche
-
  • Offline-first architecture enables use in commercial kitchen environments
  • USDA-verified density database creates a technical switching cost
  • One-time purchase model avoids subscription-fatigue churn
  • Digital loyalty system incentivizes repeat in-shop visits
  • Direct customer relationship fosters brand intimacy
Weaknesses
  • Zero user reviews limit social proof
  • No loyalty program to drive repeat usage
  • Premium tier at $9.99/month above category median
  • Missing real-time item substitution tools for groceries
  • Higher delivery fees compared to fee-free thresholds
  • No clear monetization path within the current free-only pricing model.
  • Absence of real-time order tracking capabilities compared to marketplace competitors.
  • Authentication failures block the conversion funnel
  • UI keyboard-overlay bugs hinder payment selection
  • High delivery fees relative to mass-market competitors
  • Limited B2B corporate ordering features compared to Seamless
  • Lack of dedicated delivery fleet causes inconsistent tracking
  • Smaller restaurant inventory limits daily-use frequency
  • No integrated loyalty program for diners
  • No monetization model limits ongoing content development
  • Lacks utility tools like meal planners or ingredient-based search
-
  • Single-platform availability limits reach
  • Lack of cloud-sync prevents cross-device recipe management
  • Free-to-paid conversion lacks clear trial-to-purchase funnel
  • Manual in-shop credit settlement creates user friction
  • Lack of mobile ordering or payment integration
Pricingfreefreemiumfreefreefreemiumfreefreepaidpaidfree
Momentum-Intense-MaintenanceIntense---IntenseMaintenance
Update Cadence-5 versions, ~6d avg-2 versions, ~19d avg5 versions, ~4d avg---5 versions2 versions, ~5d avg

Compare Contrast head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Contrast, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0