MARLVEL

Mister Pizza MX vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Mister Pizza MX's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Mister Pizza MX
This App
Uber Eats: Food & Groceries
Nemesis
ChowNow: Local Food Ordering
Contender
Caviar - Order Food Delivery
Contender
woso
Contender
Pressto!
Contender
Blue Nile Injera
Peer
Tare: Ingredient Converter
Peer
Fermenters Friend
Peer
CookingPal - Connected Cooking
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperOrionsoft SpAUber Technologies, Inc.ChowNowCaviar, Inc.PumpApp Solutions ABAppfront A.I. LTDBerhane Asbu AsmelashCameron McconnellBlaze SoftwareTecPal Ltd.
CategoryFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkUtilitiesFood & Drink
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating5.0 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 54.5 / 54.2 / 5
Ratings Count110,502,60725,090170,784001125
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMar 8, 2022Mar 1, 2016Jun 13, 2017Dec 4, 2014Jun 22, 2021Jun 19, 2024Mar 5, 2026Mar 26, 2026Jun 26, 2015Jun 18, 2021
Last UpdatedJan 22, 2026Jun 29, 2026Mar 24, 2026Jun 29, 2026Sep 4, 2023Jun 19, 2024Mar 6, 2026May 4, 2026Jun 26, 2015Oct 26, 2023
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--positivepositive------
Score--85/10085/100------
Praises--
  • Fair commission structure
  • Exclusive restaurant selection
------
Complaints--
  • Inconsistent delivery tracking
  • High delivery fees
------
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Loyalty program incentivizes direct-channel retention
  • Commission-free model allows for competitive pricing
  • Direct brand relationship enables exclusive promotions
  • Global logistics network provides consistent delivery density
  • Multi-category marketplace captures non-restaurant retail spend
  • Uber One subscription creates high-frequency user lock-in
  • Commission-free model aligns incentives with independent restaurants
  • 24/7 human support builds trust with restaurant partners
  • Brand positioning attracts value-conscious diners
  • Curated restaurant partnerships create a premium brand identity
  • DashPass integration provides a proven recurring-revenue retention loop
  • Zero-fee transactional model reduces overhead costs
  • White-label branding enables merchant-owned customer data
  • POS integration reduces operational friction for staff
  • Digital loyalty system incentivizes repeat in-shop visits
  • Direct customer relationship fosters brand intimacy
  • Offline-first architecture enables use in commercial kitchen environments
  • USDA-verified density database creates a technical switching cost
  • One-time purchase model avoids subscription-fatigue churn
  • Brand-aligned utility drives trust for Hillbilby Cultured Foods
  • Precise salt-ratio calculation solves specific DIY fermentation pain points
  • Hardware-software integration enables remote appliance control
  • Weekly recipe updates sustain content freshness
Weaknesses
  • Zero Android rating count indicates low adoption
  • Lack of real-time delivery tracking
  • Single-brand focus limits discovery
  • Premium tier at $9.99/month above category median
  • Missing real-time item substitution tools for groceries
  • Higher delivery fees compared to fee-free thresholds
  • Lack of dedicated delivery fleet causes inconsistent tracking
  • Smaller restaurant inventory limits daily-use frequency
  • No integrated loyalty program for diners
  • High delivery fees relative to mass-market competitors
  • Limited B2B corporate ordering features compared to Seamless
  • No integrated loyalty program for retention
  • Manual notification system lacks real-time tracking
  • Zero consumer-facing discovery mechanism
  • High reliance on merchant-driven marketing
  • Manual in-shop credit settlement creates user friction
  • Lack of mobile ordering or payment integration
  • Single-platform availability limits reach
  • Lack of cloud-sync prevents cross-device recipe management
  • Free-to-paid conversion lacks clear trial-to-purchase funnel
  • Zero persistent logging functionality limits repeat usage
  • Low review volume (2 total) indicates poor organic discovery
  • No cloud-sync for user recipes
  • Hardware-locked functionality restricts user acquisition
  • Low review count (1) indicates weak social proof
Pricingfreefreemiumfreefreemiumfreesubscriptionfreepaidfreefree
MomentumMaintenanceIntense-Intense-ZombieMaintenanceIntenseZombieZombie
Update Cadence5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~55d avg5 versions, ~6d avg-5 versions, ~4d avg-2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~31d avg2 versions, ~5d avg5 versions1 versions2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg

Compare Mister Pizza MX head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Mister Pizza MX, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0