Plants vs. Zombies™ Heroes vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Plants vs. Zombies™ Heroes's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperElectronic ArtsBlizzard Entertainment, Inc.KONAMIGalaxy Play Technology LimitedFunPlus International AGScopely, Inc.Plarium Global Ltd
CategoryGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGames
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.7 / 54.2 / 54.7 / 54.6 / 54.6 / 54.6 / 54.9 / 5
Ratings Count131,862119,50589,46693,156381,543303,282206,343
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateOct 18, 2016Apr 16, 2014Jan 11, 2017Apr 12, 2021Aug 30, 2019Mar 28, 2018Jul 10, 2020
Last UpdatedDec 8, 2025Apr 16, 2026Mar 24, 2026Apr 30, 2026Apr 16, 2026Apr 8, 2026Apr 14, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativeterriblemixedpositivemixedmixedmixed
Score25/10018/10047/10075/10045/10042/10055/100
Praises
  • Core strategic card gameplay provides a deep and engaging experience for long-term fans
  • Core Gameplay Mechanics
  • Nostalgia and Anime Fidelity
  • Gameplay Format
  • Engaging core gameplay loop provides long-term entertainment value for returning players
  • Engaging Gameplay
  • Social/Alliance Features
  • Engaging Gameplay and Content
  • Frequent Updates
  • Fast-paced combat and mech customization mechanics provide high replay value for casual players
Complaints
  • Aggressive monetization and pay-to-win mechanics gate progression for free-to-play users
  • Technical Instability & Crashes
  • Privacy & Doxing Concerns
  • Frequent Freezing and Crashing
  • PVP Balance and Meta Issues
  • Aggressive pay-to-win mechanics create insurmountable power gaps between free and paying players
  • Aggressive Pay-to-Win Mechanics
  • Poor Customer Support
  • Aggressive Monetization
  • Technical Instability
  • Aggressive pay-to-win matchmaking pairs free players against high-spending opponents with superior gear
Requests
  • Implementation of a pity system for card packs to improve reward fairness
--
  • Improved UI navigation for exploration missions to reduce unnecessary map transitions
--
  • Skill-based matchmaking systems are needed to ensure fair competition for non-paying players
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Dual-faction gameplay mechanism doubles collectible card pool
  • Franchise IP provides high initial brand recognition
  • Seasonal leaderboard resets drive recurring competitive engagement
  • Warcraft IP integration
  • Battlegrounds mode as a retention moat
  • Mature cross-platform sync
  • Massive 9-year content library and canon integration
  • High-fidelity 3D animations and original anime voice acting
  • Optimized mobile-first 'Speed Duel' format
  • Official comic book license drives immediate brand recognition [Market Segment]
  • Clan-based territory competition creates social pressure to spend [Retention Mechanism]
  • High-profile IP partnerships (Rambo, Resident Evil)
  • Massive active user base (2.6M+ ratings)
  • Diverse gameplay modes (Survival Royale, Puzzle Party)
  • Tier-1 Marvel IP with high-fidelity character modeling
  • Best-in-class cinematic combat animations
  • Strong Alliance-based social engagement
  • Cross-platform sync via Plarium Play drives session duration
  • Offline-capable engine lowers acquisition barriers in emerging markets
Weaknesses
  • 0.6★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific technical debt
  • Aggressive ad-to-gameplay ratio drives uninstall churn
  • Lack of pity system for card packs creates reward unfairness
  • Severe technical debt (login loops/crashes)
  • 10GB+ storage requirement
  • Real-name exposure privacy bug
  • Severe technical instability on flagship Android devices (Samsung S25/Tab S9)
  • High friction for veterans due to unskippable tutorials
  • Perceived 'Pay-to-Win' barrier in endgame competitive play
  • Aggressive pay-to-win mechanics create power gaps [User Sentiment]
  • Opaque account recovery process frustrates users [User Sentiment]
  • Extreme P2W perception among long-term players
  • Poor customer support responsiveness
  • Polarizing sexualized character content
  • Severe technical instability and frequent app crashes
  • Perceived 'pay-to-win' barriers in late-game meta
  • Dismissive customer support experiences
  • 0.63 rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
  • Matchmaking imbalances drive high-frequency pay-to-win complaints
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemium
MomentumMaintenanceActiveActiveActiveIntenseIntenseActive
Update Cadence5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~53d avg5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~8d avg5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~25d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~4d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~4d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~7d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~9d avg

Compare Plants vs. Zombies™ Heroes head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Plants vs. Zombies™ Heroes, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0