Smiths Diner & Takeaway App vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Smiths Diner & Takeaway App's closest competitors: identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

woso
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperFlipdishUber Technologies, Inc.Crmb, LLCCaviar, Inc.ChowNowPumpApp Solutions ABBerhane Asbu AsmelashCameron McconnellChristopher RomaniFlorencia Martigani
CategoryFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & DrinkFood & Drink
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 54.8 / 55.0 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 51.0 / 5
Ratings Count010,546,7272170,85425,15301111
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$0.99Free
Release DateJan 23, 2017Mar 1, 2016Dec 20, 2023Dec 4, 2014Jun 13, 2017Jun 22, 2021Mar 5, 2026Mar 26, 2026Jan 2, 2026Nov 29, 2023
Last UpdatedSep 11, 2024Jul 13, 2026Jan 30, 2024Jul 13, 2026Mar 24, 2026Sep 4, 2023Mar 6, 2026May 4, 2026Jan 2, 2026Nov 29, 2023
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment---positivepositive-----
Score---85/10085/100-----
Praises---
  • Exclusive restaurant selection
  • Fair commission structure
-----
Complaints---
  • High delivery fees
  • Inconsistent delivery tracking
-----
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Direct-to-kitchen ordering bypasses third-party commission fees
  • Dedicated catering channel captures high-margin event business
  • Global driver network sustains delivery velocity across hundreds of cities
  • Multi-category marketplace integrates grocery and pharmacy, increasing wallet share per user
  • Direct-to-consumer ordering bypasses third-party commission fees
  • Curated restaurant partnerships function as a barrier to entry for mass-market aggregators
  • DashPass integration provides a recurring revenue mechanism for high-frequency users
  • Fair commission structure functions as a B2B distribution barrier into independent restaurant partnerships
  • 24/7 human support creates a trust-based retention loop
  • Zero-fee transactional model sustains restaurant-side margins
  • Digital loyalty system incentivizes repeat in-shop visits
  • Direct customer relationship fosters brand intimacy
  • Offline-first architecture enables use in commercial kitchen environments
  • USDA-verified density database creates a technical switching cost
  • One-time purchase model avoids subscription-fatigue churn
--
Weaknesses
  • Zero loyalty or gamification features
  • No automated reordering engine
  • Lack of user-facing status notifications
  • Automated support systems trigger high-frequency refund complaints
  • Premium subscription pricing creates a barrier for price-sensitive casual users
  • Lack of dietary filtering or in-store payment integration
  • Delivery fees are a primary frustration theme in user reviews
  • Limited geographic availability compared to mass-market rivals
  • Inconsistent delivery tracking relative to logistics-heavy rivals
  • Limited restaurant availability compared to major aggregators
  • Lack of order history tracking frustrates repeat users
  • Manual in-shop credit settlement creates user friction
  • Lack of mobile ordering or payment integration
  • Single-platform availability limits reach
  • Lack of cloud-sync prevents cross-device recipe management
  • Free-to-paid conversion lacks clear trial-to-purchase funnel
--
Pricingfreefreemiumfreefreemiumfreefreefreepaidpaidfree
MomentumMaintenanceIntense-Intense--MaintenanceIntense--
Update Cadence2 versions, ~7d avg5 versions, ~6d avg-5 versions, ~4d avg--2 versions, ~5d avg5 versions--

Compare Smiths Diner & Takeaway App head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Smiths Diner & Takeaway App, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0