MARLVEL

Space Shooter: Galaxy Invader vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Space Shooter: Galaxy Invader's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Space Shooter: Galaxy Invader
This App
Galaxy Attack: Alien Shooter
Nemesis
Galaga Wars+
Contender
Super Pixelander
Contender
Galaxy Invader - Alien Shooter
Contender
Galaxy Strike: Space Shooter
Contender
Pulsar
Peer
iSpaceCommander
Peer
Cave FRVR
Peer
Hop Skip Rush Offline Tap Jump
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperAnh NguyenDino Game LimitedBandai Namco Entertainment Inc.Sunny TamMai DucTri DinhAfterburn Lukasz SpierewkaNicholas WilsonFRVRMDBTDJ
CategoryGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesCasual
PlatformiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.9 / 54.7 / 54.3 / 54.5 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.9 / 50.0 / 54.5 / 54.5 / 5
Ratings Count1,543645,96378165694011023729,872
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$0.99FreeFree
Release DateMar 6, 2021Nov 15, 2016Nov 12, 2021Jun 26, 2014Sep 21, 2020Dec 14, 2020Aug 2, 2018Nov 17, 2011Nov 15, 2018Sep 29, 2016
Last UpdatedFeb 3, 2026May 13, 2026Aug 28, 2023Jul 14, 2014Jul 27, 2023Dec 29, 2020Aug 2, 2018Apr 29, 2026Dec 2, 2025Nov 23, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentpositivemixednegative--positive----
Score85/10035/10035/100--80/100----
Praises
  • Satisfying classic arcade gameplay
  • Arcade-style shooting mechanics provide nostalgic entertainment value for long-term players
  • Clan systems foster social connection and community building among global players
  • Classic arcade gameplay mechanics provide nostalgic entertainment for long-term fans of the franchise
--
  • Simple arcade mechanics
----
Complaints-
  • PvP matchmaking pairs players against significantly stronger opponents, creating an unfair competitive environment
  • Excessive ad frequency and duration disrupt the core gameplay experience for free players
  • Technical instability and performance regressions following the latest update prevent access to core modes
  • Frequent application crashes on startup and mid-game render the experience unplayable for many
--
  • Progression difficulty walls
----
Requests-
  • In-game translation tools are needed to facilitate communication within international clan groups
  • Bulk chest opening and game speed toggles would improve quality of life for daily players
  • Implementation of multiplayer functionality to increase replayability and social engagement
-------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Focused arcade loop lowers entry barrier for casual players
  • High rating baseline (4.91 stars) on iOS indicates core mechanic satisfaction
  • Classic arcade loop sustains long-term player retention
  • Clan systems foster social network effects among global players
  • Bandai Namco brand identity sustains organic install velocity
  • Simplified control scheme lowers entry barriers for casual users
-
  • High-quality assets optimized for tablets sustain visual appeal
  • Active skill system adds tactical depth to standard arcade loops
  • Offline-first architecture ensures accessibility in low-connectivity markets
  • Simple swipe controls remove onboarding friction
  • Haptic Pattern Composer functions as a technical differentiator for SDK adoption
  • Minimalist design lowers the barrier to entry for casual sessions
  • $0.99 one-time purchase model removes ad-friction
  • Offline-first architecture ensures playability
-
  • Physics-based slingshot mechanics provide a more tactile gameplay experience than simple evasion
  • Four distinct visual environments sustain visual interest across long sessions
Weaknesses
  • Zero Android footprint
  • No social leaderboards to drive competitive retention
  • Monetization limited to ad-supported currency loop
  • PvP matchmaking logic forces unfair losses for free players
  • Ad frequency exceeds playtime for non-paying users
  • Technical regressions in the latest update block core modes
  • Persistent startup crashes on Android hardware
  • Lack of content updates beyond sector bosses
  • Aggressive monetization in the free-to-play tier
-
  • Static progression model lacks long-term retention hooks
  • 69-rating count indicates low social proof
  • No multiplayer infrastructure
  • Progression-wall monetization creates churn at mid-game levels
  • Lack of seasonal content limits long-term retention
  • No structured progression or campaign mode
  • 0 reviews on Android platform
  • Lack of IAP or ad-based monetization
  • Zero content updates since 2011 release
  • Absence of modern social-multiplayer features
-
  • Android paid-entry barrier ($2.49) restricts top-of-funnel growth
  • Lack of social competition features limits long-term retention
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreefreemiumfreemiumfreepaidfreefreemium
MomentumMaintenanceActiveZombie-ZombieZombie-Maintenance-Maintenance
Update Cadence5 versions, ~177d avg5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~9d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~1126d avg-5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~259d avg2 versions, ~1744d avg-1 versions-2 versions, ~175d avg

Compare Space Shooter: Galaxy Invader head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Space Shooter: Galaxy Invader, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0