browser-app.com
Publisher DNA
What defines browser-app.com?
AI intelligence is not yet available for browser-app.com. The portfolio data below is up to date.
Portfolio
What does browser-app.com ship?
Apps
2 apps analysed
PIN-locked private bookmarks isolate browsing history on shared living room hardware
- High browsing speed and performance improvements make this a preferred alternative to the default browser
- Video playback errors and streaming instability on television boxes disrupt the media consumption experience
Analysis in progress
Distributed across 12 markets, strongest in Europe.
Based on 1 of 2 apps with localized market data, more coverage rolling in as scans complete · last scanned .
Americas (3)
- Brazil1 / 1
- Mexico1 / 1
- United States1 / 1
Europe (7)
- France1 / 1
- Germany1 / 1
- Italy1 / 1
- Netherlands1 / 1
- Portugal1 / 1
›+2 more europe markets
- Spain1 / 1
- Sweden1 / 1
Asia-Pacific (2)
- Japan1 / 1
- South Korea1 / 1
Core markets (1/1 apps)
User Sentiment
How do users feel about their apps?
1
Positive apps
0
Neutral / mixed
0
Negative apps
75/100
Avg sentiment score
Rivals
Who does browser-app.com compete with?
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
Firefox Focus competes by targeting the same privacy-conscious mobile user base, overlapping directly with the ad blocking and incognito browsing features found in BROWSER with TV Remote.
Contenders(9)
Both apps compete for mobile users by bundling utility features into a web browser, with Aloha focusing on privacy and file management while BROWSER with TV Remote targets TV-connected users.
Both apps compete for the same mobile browsing audience by offering free, feature-rich web access with distinct interface customization options.
Both applications target the privacy-focused mobile web browsing market with free, ad-supported models. They compete for users seeking built-in ad-blocking and incognito browsing capabilities.
Both applications compete for the same mobile web browsing audience by offering customizable interfaces and privacy-focused features on the iOS platform.
Both applications compete for the lightweight browser utility market, sharing core ad-blocking and privacy-focused browsing functionality for mobile users.
Both apps compete for mobile browsing market share, with Microsoft Edge targeting productivity-focused users while BROWSER with TV Remote emphasizes utility-based browsing and media playback.
Both applications target privacy-conscious mobile users by offering free web browsing with integrated ad-blocking and tracking-prevention tools.
Both applications target users prioritizing privacy, with BROWSER with TV Remote providing standard web-surfing tools while Secret Browser focuses on physical device concealment.
Both applications target privacy-conscious mobile users with free, ad-blocking browsing tools, competing directly for the same segment of users seeking a clean and tracker-free web experience.
Same space(19)
It provides a dedicated remote interface for Mi TV products, overlapping with the browser's TV remote features.
It addresses the same ad-clutter pain point for Safari users that the browser's built-in blocker targets.
It provides a specialized TV remote interface for specific brands like Arçelik and Beko.
It targets the same privacy-focused mobile audience by bundling security tools directly into the browsing experience.
It competes for the same privacy-conscious mobile web audience by offering built-in ad-blocking as a core utility.
It targets the same privacy-conscious audience but provides higher-level anonymity through the TOR network.
It competes for the same privacy-focused browser audience by bundling Web3 tools and AI assistants.
It provides a simplified ad-blocking utility for Safari users, similar to the browser's built-in protection.
It provides a free, universal interface for Android TV hardware that overlaps with the browser's TV remote functionality.
It provides a similar universal TV control utility but relies on an aggressive subscription model that contrasts with the browser's free-to-use approach.
It provides similar redirect and popup filtering functionality for mobile web users.
It serves the same Smart TV control use case but focuses on gesture-based navigation rather than browser-integrated control.
It addresses the same cross-device media consumption need by bridging the gap between mobile storage and TV screens.
It serves the same ad-blocking utility market but focuses on manual configuration for power users.
It offers a similar ad-free browsing experience for iOS users, focusing on speed and data efficiency.
It competes for the same minimalist, speed-focused browser audience on iOS.
It offers a similar TV control utility for Android-based hardware, emphasizing D-pad and keyboard input.
It bundles VPN and privacy tools into a browser, targeting the same security-conscious user segment.
It complements the TV control utility by enabling direct media transfer between mobile devices and televisions.
New entrants(2)
It targets the same video-centric browsing audience but focuses on local file management.
It competes for the same privacy-conscious audience by offering always-on shields and tracker blocking.