Oilist vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Oilist's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Oilist
This App
Core Identity
Developer3DTOPO Inc.Prisma labs, inc.Bazaart Ltd.Prequel Inc.Xiamen Meitu Technology Co., Ltd.Adobe Inc.Invideo IncSCALEUP YAZILIM HIZMETLERI
CategoryPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & Video
PlatformiOSiOSAndroid, iOSiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.6 / 54.5 / 5
Ratings Count3,778415,480257,339332,80678,493739,08226,60876,068
PriceUSD2.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateApr 20, 2017Nov 16, 2018Apr 6, 2012Mar 29, 2018Feb 15, 2011Oct 9, 2009Nov 15, 2023Dec 31, 2022
Last UpdatedAug 23, 2019May 19, 2026May 2, 2026Mar 27, 2026Apr 28, 2026Apr 3, 2026May 7, 2026Apr 29, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentpositivemixedpositivenegativenegativemixedterribleterrible
Score85/10045/10075/10025/10025/10045/10015/10015/100
Praises
  • Realtime adjustable painting settings allow users to create infinite artistic variety from photos
  • High quality photo editing results provide professional outcomes without requiring manual retouching expertise
  • Versatile creative tools allow users to produce professional graphic designs without needing advanced technical skills
  • High quality visual effects and creative tools provide aesthetic value for photography enthusiasts
  • High-quality photo editing tools provide professional results for casual social media users
  • AI-powered photo restoration features deliver effective results for damaged or low-quality images
  • Ease of Use
  • High quality video generation capabilities provide value for content creators seeking professional results
  • High quality and professional visual output generated by the core AI engine
Complaints
  • Sluggish painting performance and unresponsive UI states occur during the image generation process
  • Aggressive monetization and opaque token systems create significant friction for casual users
  • Aggressive transition to subscription models alienates long-term users who previously held lifetime access
  • Aggressive paywalling of basic editing features forces unwanted subscription commitments for casual users
  • Arbitrary usage caps on premium effects limit utility even for active paid subscribers
  • Aggressive ad frequency and intrusive full-screen pop-ups disrupt the core photo editing workflow
  • Removal of user-defined retouch templates forces manual, repetitive editing for frequent content creators
  • Pay-to-play transition gates previously free features behind subscription tiers, alienating long-term users
  • App Stability
  • Monetization Friction
  • Aggressive credit consumption models prevent users from completing even a single video generation task
  • Aggressive monetization strategy forces recurring payments for individual image generations post-subscription
Requests
  • Status bar indicator during the painting process to show progress and completion status
  • Restoration of manual face and skin retouching tools for greater creative control
  • Expanded export options including PDF support and external brush imports for professional design workflows
  • Improved transparency regarding free versus premium feature availability within the interface
  • Restoration of the custom template saving feature to allow for uniform batch editing
-
  • Implementation of a genuine free trial period to evaluate output quality before financial commitment
  • Transparent free trial or demonstration mode to evaluate quality before financial commitment
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • One-time purchase model removes subscription friction
  • Generative engine creates high switching costs
  • 4K export supports professional-grade physical output
  • High-quality generative AI output drives immediate visual satisfaction
  • Intuitive interface lowers the barrier for casual users
  • Premium-tier gating of high-margin features captures user willingness-to-pay
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
  • Cloud-sync project history functions as a switching-cost barrier
  • All-in-one design suite integrates video and graphic templates
  • Curated aesthetic library sustains brand identity
  • D3D motion-graphics provide unique creative output
  • High-quality filter library drives organic social sharing
  • 1000+ material library drives recurring subscription value
  • AI-powered portrait detection provides high-fidelity results
  • Multi-track video editor captures social media creator workflows
  • Adobe Firefly integration for Generative Fill
  • Creative Cloud ecosystem connectivity
  • High-quality technical imaging algorithms
  • Agent One's long-term project memory creates professional-grade consistency
  • Multi-language voice cloning increases creator switching costs
  • Real-time collaboration tools enable team-based B2B workflows
  • High-velocity trend adoption drives viral sharing
  • One-tap professional utility reduces user effort
Weaknesses
  • Sluggish performance on modern hardware
  • Removal of legacy presets limits creative options
  • Lack of progress indicators during rendering
  • 45 sentiment score reflects high friction from token-gated basic features
  • Removal of manual sliders triggers churn among power users
  • Technical instability during export disrupts core workflows
  • Premium tier pricing above category median
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • No cloud-save despite 142 requests in reviews
  • Premium tier at category-median pricing
  • 10-use weekly limit on AI effects
  • Frequent crashes during large library access
  • Aggressive ad frequency disrupts core editing flow
  • Removal of custom template-saving forces repetitive manual work
  • Subscription gating of previously free features drives negative sentiment
  • Critical 'infinite loading' stability bugs
  • Intrusive AI UI (25% screen coverage)
  • Aggressive watermarking on free tier
  • Aggressive credit consumption prevents task completion
  • Lack of transparent trial options drives negative sentiment
  • 0.5★ rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
  • Bait-and-switch monetization drives churn
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates instability
  • Lack of free trial prevents quality verification
Pricingpaidfreemiumsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemium
MomentumZombieSteadyActiveActiveIntenseIntenseIntenseActive
Update Cadence5 versions5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~19d avg5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~11d avg5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~23d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~7d avg4 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~20d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~7d avg5 versions, ~5d avg

Compare Oilist head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Oilist, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0