Adobe Photoshop: Photo Editor vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Adobe Photoshop: Photo Editor's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperAdobe Inc.PicsArt, Inc.Chengdu Everimaging Science and Technology Co., LtdCanvaPhotoroomSHANTANU PTE. LTD.Bending Spoons Apps ApSPIXOCIAL TECHNOLOGY (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.Xiamen Meitu Technology Co., Ltd.
CategoryPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & Video
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOSAndroid, iOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.5 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.9 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count88,0301,192,72841,7413,303,370224,8422,422,504340,598345,16543,560
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateNov 7, 2019Jan 2, 2013Jul 24, 2011Oct 15, 2014Mar 26, 2019Jun 11, 2015Aug 1, 2019Apr 25, 2013Dec 17, 2021
Last UpdatedApr 13, 2026Jul 1, 2026Apr 13, 2026Apr 8, 2026Jun 29, 2026Apr 28, 2026May 18, 2026May 14, 2026Apr 28, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativenegativemixedpositivemixedmixedmixednegativepositive
Score35/10025/10055/10078/10055/10065/10045/10035/10065/100
Praises
  • Mobile accessibility of professional editing tools provides high value for on-the-go creative tasks
  • Extensive library of editing effects and creative tools provides unmatched artistic versatility
  • AI-powered image restoration tools provide high-quality results for aging or blurry photographs
  • Ease of Use
  • Creative Versatility
  • Background removal and replacement tools provide high value for product photography and social media content
  • Intuitive video editing tools allow beginners to create high quality content without complex learning curves
  • AI-powered photo enhancement delivers high-quality visual results for blurry or low-resolution images
  • High quality photo editing tools provide satisfying results for daily creative content creation
  • High-definition quality enhancement tools provide significant visual improvements for user-generated content and social media edits
Complaints
  • Post-update stability issues including freezing and loading failures disrupt core editing workflows
  • Aggressive advertising and forced pop-ups disrupt the editing workflow and degrade user experience
  • Subscription cancellation processes are intentionally difficult to navigate and lead to unwanted recurring charges
  • Aggressive Monetization
  • Technical Glitches
  • Aggressive monetization and restrictive usage limits frustrate users who previously enjoyed unlimited free access
  • Frequent export failures and conversion errors disrupt the final stage of the video editing workflow
  • Excessive advertisement frequency forces users to watch multiple videos before completing a single edit
  • Aggressive monetization tactics gate previously free features behind expensive annual subscription paywalls
  • Frequent application crashes and performance lag during export processes disrupt the editing workflow for many users
Requests
  • Expanded feature parity with desktop software including custom brushes and advanced layer management
  • Option to disable AI-driven features and content for users preferring traditional editing tools
  • Precision control tools like text box snapping and batch editing for basic improvements
-
  • Restoration of unlimited or more generous free editing tiers for casual users
  • Expanded music library integration would allow for more personalized and popular song choices in edits
  • Reduced advertisement duration or frequency to improve the usability of the free tier
  • Flexible pricing models including monthly options that are more affordable for casual users
  • Expanded canvas size options and customization tools for better control over video dimensions and aspect ratios
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Desktop-to-mobile engine compatibility maintains professional creative standards
  • Creative Cloud Libraries lock teams into centralized asset management
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
  • 60M+ sticker library functions as a community-driven acquisition moat
  • All-in-one toolset reduces app-switching costs
  • AI Agent interface simplifies complex multi-step edits
  • High-utility restoration tools drive repeat usage
  • Intuitive UI accessible to non-professionals
  • Massive integrated library of 100M+ stock elements
  • Seamless cross-platform syncing and real-time collaboration
  • Automated background removal functions as a high-utility retention lever
  • Batch-processing workflow creates high switching costs for professional e-commerce sellers
  • Virtual model AI provides a premium differentiator for apparel retailers
  • Intuitive interface lowers barrier to entry
  • Freemium gate effectively segments casual vs. prosumer users
  • Diverse effect library sustains creative engagement
  • Neural restoration engine provides high-fidelity output
  • Viral before/after sharing drives organic installs
  • Established brand recognition in restoration niche
  • Editors' Choice badge across 30+ markets sustains organic install velocity
  • 800 million user base provides massive data for AI model refinement
  • Broad library of 400+ filters creates high switching costs for casual users
  • AI 4K upscaling engine functions as a primary conversion lever for paid subscriptions
Weaknesses
  • $22.99/month subscription tier exceeds mobile-creative median
  • Post-update stability regressions disrupt core editing workflows
  • Premium tier pricing above category median
  • 0.6★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • Aggressive ad-frequency triggers high-churn complaints
  • Subscription cancellation friction triggers high-churn sentiment
  • Inconsistent AI output quality wastes user credits
  • Technical regressions erode UI reliability
  • Resentment over paywalling previously free features
  • Mobile video export glitches (content clipping)
  • Lack of advanced search and organization functionality
  • Generation caps on free tiers drive high-frequency negative sentiment
  • Technical instability and app crashes disrupt professional creative workflows
  • Billing discrepancies and refund complaints erode long-term brand trust
  • Frequent export failures disrupt final workflow
  • High storage footprint forces project deletion
  • Intrusive ads degrade navigation
  • High ad-to-value ratio drives churn
  • Technical instability freezes post-ad
  • Aggressive pop-ups disrupt editing flow
  • Premium tier annual plan pricing exceeds category median
  • 0.24-star Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific instability
  • Deceptive trial-to-subscription billing complaints erode brand trust
  • Frequent export crashes during the editing pipeline disrupt daily active usage
Pricingsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumsubscription
MomentumActiveIntenseActiveActiveIntenseActiveActiveActiveActive
Update Cadence5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~12d avg5 versions, ~5d avg5 versions, ~7d avg3 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~13d avg5 versions, ~2d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~20d avg5 versions, ~8d avg5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~15d avg5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~7d avg

Compare Adobe Photoshop: Photo Editor head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Adobe Photoshop: Photo Editor, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0