Perfect365 Makeup Photo Editor vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Perfect365 Makeup Photo Editor's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperPerfect365, Inc.PIXOCIAL TECHNOLOGY (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.Lightricks Ltd.PIXOCIAL TECHNOLOGY (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.Adobe Inc.FaceApp Technology LimitedPicsArt, Inc.Bending Spoons Apps ApSPrisma labs, inc.
CategoryLifestylePhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & Video
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.6 / 54.7 / 5
Ratings Count181,267345,165364,651197,11050,6771,753,0751,192,673340,598415,480
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateNov 17, 2011Apr 25, 2013Nov 24, 2016Oct 8, 2015Apr 8, 2014Jan 24, 2017Jan 2, 2013Aug 1, 2019Nov 16, 2018
Last UpdatedApr 29, 2026May 14, 2026Apr 16, 2026Apr 29, 2026Apr 15, 2026Apr 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026May 18, 2026May 19, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativenegativeterriblemixedmixedmixednegativemixedmixed
Score25/10035/10015/10075/10048/10045/10025/10045/10045/100
Praises
  • Subtle and natural photo touchup tools provide authentic results for long-term users
  • Preset saving functionality allows for efficient and consistent editing workflows
  • High quality photo editing tools provide satisfying results for daily creative content creation
  • Legacy Retouching Quality
  • Advanced facial retouching tools provide professional results for casual photo editing needs
  • Powerful Editing Capabilities
  • Ease of Use
  • High-quality photo editing tools allow users to refine selfies with natural results
  • Extensive library of editing effects and creative tools provides unmatched artistic versatility
  • AI-powered photo enhancement delivers high-quality visual results for blurry or low-resolution images
  • High quality photo editing results provide professional outcomes without requiring manual retouching expertise
Complaints
  • Aggressive ad implementation prevents users from saving edited photos after the latest update
  • Unexpected subscription charges and difficult cancellation processes frustrate long-term users
  • Aggressive monetization tactics gate previously free features behind expensive annual subscription paywalls
  • Predatory Pricing & Paywalls
  • Deceptive Billing & Cancellation
  • Removal of Core Features
  • Aggressive monetization shifts lock previously free features behind a mandatory subscription paywall
  • Stability and Performance
  • Workflow and Naming Bugs
  • Aggressive paywalling of basic editing features frustrates long-term users
  • Aggressive advertising and forced pop-ups disrupt the editing workflow and degrade user experience
  • Excessive advertisement frequency forces users to watch multiple videos before completing a single edit
  • Aggressive monetization and opaque token systems create significant friction for casual users
Requests
  • Dark mode interface requested to improve usability during extended editing sessions
  • Flexible pricing models including monthly options that are more affordable for casual users
-
  • Manual erase functionality for specific feature applications to improve editing precision
-
  • Reintroduction of legacy features like face morphing and video editing capabilities
  • Option to disable AI-driven features and content for users preferring traditional editing tools
  • Reduced advertisement duration or frequency to improve the usability of the free tier
  • Restoration of manual face and skin retouching tools for greater creative control
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Professional-grade makeup library curated by artists
  • AR-based facial recognition accuracy
  • Preset-saving workflow for consistent editing
  • Editors' Choice badge across 30+ markets sustains organic install velocity
  • 800 million user base provides massive data for AI model refinement
  • Broad library of 400+ filters creates high switching costs for casual users
  • Comprehensive video retouching suite (major moat)
  • High-fidelity AI Headshot generation
  • Strong brand recognition and #5 grossing rank
  • Editors' Choice badge sustains organic install velocity
  • Intuitive icon-based interface lowers barrier for non-technical users
  • Generative AI (Firefly) integration for object removal
  • Seamless cross-platform sync with Creative Cloud
  • Advanced AI-driven culling and organization tools
  • Viral social-sharing loops driven by age/gender filters
  • High-fidelity AI engine for photorealistic results
  • Category-leading global chart presence
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
  • 60M+ sticker library functions as a community-driven acquisition moat
  • Neural restoration engine provides high-fidelity output
  • Viral before/after sharing drives organic installs
  • Established brand recognition in restoration niche
  • High-quality generative AI output drives immediate visual satisfaction
  • Intuitive interface lowers the barrier for casual users
  • Premium-tier gating of high-margin features captures user willingness-to-pay
Weaknesses
  • Aggressive ad-gating blocks save functionality
  • $39.99/year subscription price point
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap
  • Premium tier annual plan pricing exceeds category median
  • 0.24-star Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific instability
  • Deceptive trial-to-subscription billing complaints erode brand trust
  • Extreme $11.99/week pricing friction
  • Loss of user trust due to billing 'dark patterns'
  • Removal of legacy filters and manual tools
  • Premium tier pricing above category median
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates technical instability
  • No manual erase tool
  • Severe performance issues/freezing on iPad Pro
  • Feature disparity between iPhone and iPad versions
  • Critical file-naming bug ('bright' bug)
  • Subscription cost above category median
  • Technical instability in the latest build
  • Subscription-cancellation friction in the UI
  • Premium tier pricing above category median
  • 0.6★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • Aggressive ad-frequency triggers high-churn complaints
  • High ad-to-value ratio drives churn
  • Technical instability freezes post-ad
  • Aggressive pop-ups disrupt editing flow
  • 45 sentiment score reflects high friction from token-gated basic features
  • Removal of manual sliders triggers churn among power users
  • Technical instability during export disrupts core workflows
Pricingsubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemium
MomentumActiveActiveIntenseActiveIntenseActiveIntenseActiveSteady
Update Cadence5 versions, ~12d avg5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~15d avg3 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~14d avg4 versions, ~12d avg3 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~15d avg5 versions, ~11d avg5 versions, ~5d avg5 versions, ~8d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~19d avg

Compare Perfect365 Makeup Photo Editor head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Perfect365 Makeup Photo Editor, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0