Nutrients - Nutrition Facts vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Nutrients - Nutrition Facts's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperPomegranate Apps LLCMyFitnessPal, Inc.MyNetDiary Inc.fatsecretFitNowNutraTech LtdStronger By Science Technologies LLCBA Global Holdings, LLCEat This Much Inc.
CategoryFood & DrinkHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessFood & DrinkHealth & Fitness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.3 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 54.7 / 5
Ratings Count8272,316,370146,55913,954750,85925,58513,180141,38421,891
PriceUSD4.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateOct 27, 2010Dec 8, 2009Feb 3, 2019Dec 23, 2009Nov 21, 2008Sep 24, 2014Sep 15, 2021Jun 22, 2021Jun 15, 2015
Last UpdatedJun 26, 2023Apr 14, 2026Apr 15, 2026Apr 30, 2026Apr 29, 2026Apr 8, 2026Apr 1, 2026Apr 10, 2026Apr 21, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativemixed-mixedmixed-mixed--
Score35/10045/100-55/10035/100-65/100--
Praises
  • Detailed nutrient tracking provides deep insight into specific vitamin and mineral intake levels
  • Weight Loss Effectiveness
  • Extensive Food Database
-
  • Comprehensive free feature set provides high value for calorie and macro tracking enthusiasts
  • Extensive food database and barcode scanning functionality support consistent long-term weight loss tracking
-
  • Highly accurate food database and barcode scanning capabilities drive consistent user weight loss results
--
Complaints
  • Barcode scanner and manual food entry features fail to function correctly following recent updates
  • Aggressive Monetization
  • Syncing and Data Integration Issues
-
  • Search functionality regressions post-update prevent users from finding common food items in the database
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features creates significant friction for long-time loyal users
-
  • Aggressive caloric deficit recommendations trigger health concerns and frustration regarding sustainable weight loss targets
--
Requests
  • Customizable search filters to omit specific food categories or regional items from results
--
  • Advanced navigation features for the nutrition calendar to jump between specific dates and weeks
  • Toggle option to disable automatic calorie bonuses when syncing with external fitness wearables
-
  • Integration with third party fitness platforms to sync exercise data and caloric expenditure
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Offline-first database architecture ensures utility in environments without connectivity
  • Granular micronutrient tracking provides a specialized resource for clinical-grade dietary research
  • Massive food database (20.5M+ entries)
  • Deep integration with 40+ third-party apps and devices
  • Dominant market position (#1 Grossing in category)
-
  • Professional-sync tools create a B2B distribution moat via health-provider referrals
  • Generous free-tier feature set sustains high organic install velocity
  • Massive 56M-item food database creates high user switching costs
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
-
  • Automated metabolic-adaptation algorithm sustains long-term retention
  • Verified food database creates a quality-based competitive barrier
  • FlavCity brand alignment drives organic acquisition
  • Red-highlighted ingredient visualization provides immediate utility
-
Weaknesses
  • Barcode scanner and manual entry bugs in the latest version drive high-frequency churn
  • Search relevance is degraded by obscure, non-local food items
  • Paywalled barcode scanner causing significant user backlash
  • Unreliable syncing with wearables (Garmin, steps)
  • Technical instability (frequent logouts, UI bugs)
-
  • Search-index regressions in the latest release break core logging utility
  • Sensitive swipe-to-delete gestures cause frequent accidental data loss
  • Premium tier gating of legacy features drives negative sentiment
  • 0.2★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific performance regressions
-
  • Premium-only pricing model ($71.99/year) limits top-of-funnel acquisition
  • Aggressive deficit logic triggers negative sentiment in reviews
  • Zero revenue diversification beyond ad-inventory
  • No personalized dietary filtering for allergies
-
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumsubscriptionfreefreemium
MomentumZombieMaintenanceIntenseActiveActiveIntenseIntenseIntenseIntense
Update Cadence5 versions4 versions, ~12d avg5 versions5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~7d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~5d avg5 versions5 versions5 versions5 versions

Compare Nutrients - Nutrition Facts head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Nutrients - Nutrition Facts, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0