| Core Identity |
| Developer | Prisma labs, inc. | Bending Spoons Apps ApS | Xiamen Meitu Technology Co., Ltd. | Prequel Inc. | SNOW Corporation | Adobe Inc. | Xiamen Meitu Technology Co., Ltd. | HUBX | Invideo Inc |
| Category | Photo & Video | Photo & Video | Photo & Video | Photo & Video | Photo & Video | Photo & Video | Photo & Video | Photo & Video | Photo & Video |
| Platform | iOS | iOS, Android | Android, iOS | iOS | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | Android, iOS | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
| Store Metrics |
| Rating | 4.7 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 | 4.7 / 5 | 4.7 / 5 | 4.7 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Ratings Count | 415,480 | 340,598 | 43,560 | 332,806 | 53,886 | 739,082 | 78,493 | 9,356 | 26,608 |
| Price | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free |
| Release Date | Nov 16, 2018 | Aug 1, 2019 | Dec 17, 2021 | Mar 29, 2018 | Aug 14, 2021 | Oct 9, 2009 | Feb 15, 2011 | Mar 29, 2024 | Nov 15, 2023 |
| Last Updated | May 19, 2026 | May 18, 2026 | Apr 28, 2026 | Mar 27, 2026 | Apr 16, 2026 | Apr 3, 2026 | Apr 28, 2026 | May 4, 2026 | May 7, 2026 |
| Sentiment & Reviews |
| Sentiment | mixed | mixed | positive | negative | mixed | mixed | negative | terrible | terrible |
| Score | 45/100 | 45/100 | 65/100 | 25/100 | 35/100 | 45/100 | 25/100 | 25/100 | 15/100 |
| Praises | - High quality photo editing results provide professional outcomes without requiring manual retouching expertise
| - AI-powered photo enhancement delivers high-quality visual results for blurry or low-resolution images
| - High-definition quality enhancement tools provide significant visual improvements for user-generated content and social media edits
| - High quality visual effects and creative tools provide aesthetic value for photography enthusiasts
| - High quality photo editing tools provide professional results for casual mobile users
| | - High-quality photo editing tools provide professional results for casual social media users
- AI-powered photo restoration features deliver effective results for damaged or low-quality images
| - High visual quality of generated videos provides satisfaction for users who successfully complete the process
| - High quality video generation capabilities provide value for content creators seeking professional results
|
| Complaints | - Aggressive monetization and opaque token systems create significant friction for casual users
| - Excessive advertisement frequency forces users to watch multiple videos before completing a single edit
| - Frequent application crashes and performance lag during export processes disrupt the editing workflow for many users
| - Aggressive paywalling of basic editing features forces unwanted subscription commitments for casual users
- Arbitrary usage caps on premium effects limit utility even for active paid subscribers
| - Aggressive paywalling of previously free features forces unwanted subscription costs on long-term users
| - App Stability
- Monetization Friction
| - Aggressive ad frequency and intrusive full-screen pop-ups disrupt the core photo editing workflow
- Removal of user-defined retouch templates forces manual, repetitive editing for frequent content creators
- Pay-to-play transition gates previously free features behind subscription tiers, alienating long-term users
| - Aggressive monetization via hidden coin costs after subscription payment creates a sense of being scammed
- Technical failures and processing errors prevent video generation despite successful payment of subscription fees
| - Aggressive credit consumption models prevent users from completing even a single video generation task
|
| Requests | - Restoration of manual face and skin retouching tools for greater creative control
| - Reduced advertisement duration or frequency to improve the usability of the free tier
| - Expanded canvas size options and customization tools for better control over video dimensions and aspect ratios
| - Improved transparency regarding free versus premium feature availability within the interface
| - Ad-supported access to premium features would allow casual users to utilize tools without full subscriptions
| - | - Restoration of the custom template saving feature to allow for uniform batch editing
| - Transparent pricing and free trial access to verify video quality before committing to a subscription
| - Implementation of a genuine free trial period to evaluate output quality before financial commitment
|
| Strategic Intel |
| Strengths | - High-quality generative AI output drives immediate visual satisfaction
- Intuitive interface lowers the barrier for casual users
- Premium-tier gating of high-margin features captures user willingness-to-pay
| - Neural restoration engine provides high-fidelity output
- Viral before/after sharing drives organic installs
- Established brand recognition in restoration niche
| - AI 4K upscaling engine functions as a primary conversion lever for paid subscriptions
| - Curated aesthetic library sustains brand identity
- D3D motion-graphics provide unique creative output
- High-quality filter library drives organic social sharing
| - AI Yearbook virality drives organic install velocity
- All-in-one suite reduces user need for multi-app workflows
| - Adobe Firefly integration for Generative Fill
- Creative Cloud ecosystem connectivity
- High-quality technical imaging algorithms
| - 1000+ material library drives recurring subscription value
- AI-powered portrait detection provides high-fidelity results
- Multi-track video editor captures social media creator workflows
| - Google Veo3 integration provides high-fidelity output
- Drag-and-drop interface lowers creative barrier
| - Agent One's long-term project memory creates professional-grade consistency
- Multi-language voice cloning increases creator switching costs
- Real-time collaboration tools enable team-based B2B workflows
|
| Weaknesses | - 45 sentiment score reflects high friction from token-gated basic features
- Removal of manual sliders triggers churn among power users
- Technical instability during export disrupts core workflows
| - High ad-to-value ratio drives churn
- Technical instability freezes post-ad
- Aggressive pop-ups disrupt editing flow
| - Frequent export crashes during the editing pipeline disrupt daily active usage
| - Premium tier at category-median pricing
- 10-use weekly limit on AI effects
- Frequent crashes during large library access
| - Premium tier pricing exceeds category median
- Restrictive export-gating triggers high-frequency churn complaints
| - Critical 'infinite loading' stability bugs
- Intrusive AI UI (25% screen coverage)
- Aggressive watermarking on free tier
| - Aggressive ad frequency disrupts core editing flow
- Removal of custom template-saving forces repetitive manual work
- Subscription gating of previously free features drives negative sentiment
| - Hidden coin costs post-subscription drive refund surges
- Technical instability during generation causes crashes
| - Aggressive credit consumption prevents task completion
- Lack of transparent trial options drives negative sentiment
- 0.5★ rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
|
| Pricing | freemium | freemium | subscription | subscription | freemium | freemium | freemium | subscription | freemium |
| Momentum | Steady | Active | Active | Active | Active | Intense | Intense | Active | Intense |
| Update Cadence | 5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~19d avg | 5 versions, ~8d avg | 5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~7d avg | 5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~23d avg | 5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~9d avg | 4 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~20d avg | 5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~7d avg | 5 versions, ~6d avg | 5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~7d avg |
