MARLVEL

Farmable: Farm Manager App vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Farmable: Farm Manager App's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Farmable: Farm Manager App
This App
Herdwatch Livestock Management
Nemesis
AgriWebb
Contender
Mobble Farm Management
Contender
ICBF HerdPlus
Contender
FarmIQ
Contender
Cropwise Operations
Peer
Agworld for iPhone
Peer
fieldmargin: manage your farm
Peer
FieldView Cab
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperFarmable ASHerdwatch LtdAgriWebbMobbleICBFFarmIQ Systems LimitedSyngenta Digital LTDAAgworld Pty LtdField Margin LtdThe Climate Corporation - US
CategoryProductivityProductivityProductivityBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessProductivityProductivityProductivity
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating3.9 / 53.5 / 54.2 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 54.6 / 54.2 / 53.8 / 5
Ratings Count111813000121599170
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateApr 3, 2019Sep 6, 2022May 3, 2017Jul 21, 2020Nov 24, 2020May 26, 2022Oct 7, 2014Nov 8, 2013Jan 26, 2017Feb 17, 2012
Last UpdatedMay 10, 2026Apr 7, 2026May 7, 2026May 5, 2026Feb 26, 2026Apr 21, 2026May 6, 2026Mar 20, 2026Apr 30, 2026Apr 15, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedmixed-----mixedmixedmixed
Score65/10050/100-----45/10060/10045/100
Praises
  • Simple and convenient to use
  • Specialized livestock focus
-----
  • Accurate crop management documentation provides reliable records for agricultural operations
  • Ease of mapping fields
  • Data visualization tools provide actionable insights for field management and hybrid selection decisions
  • Cross-platform hardware compatibility allows farmers to monitor diverse machinery brands in one place
Complaints
  • Limited free-tier spray record capacity
  • List-centric navigation
-----
  • Complex harvest input workflows increase time spent on manual data entry
  • Offline sync reliability
  • Inaccurate acre counting and field mapping data erode trust in the platform for operational planning
  • Subscription requirements for basic data access create friction for long-term agricultural users
Requests-
  • Interactive field mapping
-----
  • Integrated hardware scanning and image capture tools for faster product entry
  • Automated input logging
  • Customizable color palettes for maps are required to support colorblind users in field analysis
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Partner portal creates B2B distribution barrier
  • Mobile-first interface lowers entry friction
  • 10 years of R&D provides a mature compliance-ready feature set
  • EID hardware integration creates a high switching cost
  • Multi-species support captures diversified farm operations
  • Interactive map-based interface simplifies paddock management for non-technical users
  • Unlimited user access model removes friction for team-wide adoption
  • Offline-first architecture ensures consistent performance in remote grazing zones
  • Mob-focused interface reduces cognitive load for livestock-heavy operations
  • National cattle breeding database integration provides genetic insights unavailable to generalist competitors
  • Alignment with national agricultural policy ensures long-term utility for Irish farmers
  • Hardware-integrated data flow creates high switching costs
  • Map-based hazard tracking provides immediate audit-time value
  • GPS machinery integration provides a unified view of field health and operational costs
  • Offline scouting functionality ensures data capture in remote agricultural zones
  • Audit-ready database structure ensures regulatory compliance
  • Collaborative platform design creates stakeholder network effects
  • Unlimited team access drives B2B network effects
  • John Deere integration creates high switching costs
  • Proprietary hardware-software integration creates high switching costs
  • Cross-platform machinery compatibility aggregates diverse fleet data
Weaknesses
  • 5-job free limit drives churn
  • Manual data entry lacks hardware automation
  • 3.5-star rating reflects UX friction
  • List-centric interface lacks spatial intuition
  • No partner portal for external collaboration
  • No direct EID reader integration for automated data entry
  • Lack of automated compliance reporting for regional agricultural standards
  • No integrated accounting tools compared to Farmbrite
  • Lacks a formalised partner portal for external service providers
  • Lack of offline mode prevents data entry in rural areas with poor connectivity
  • Legacy mobile interface creates friction compared to modern field-first apps
  • Dual-app architecture creates significant user friction
  • Lack of native offline-first synchronization
  • Gated B2B subscription model prevents organic user acquisition
  • Android-iOS rating gap suggests platform-specific stability issues
  • Complex harvest input workflows increase manual entry time
  • Synchronization delays disrupt field operations
  • Offline sync reliability issues
  • Lack of automated regulatory reporting
  • High Pro-tier pricing relative to manual-entry utility
  • Inaccurate acre counting and mapping data
  • Subscription-gated access to historical data
  • Connectivity instability with field hardware
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumsubscriptionfreesubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemium
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~1d avg2 versions, ~5d avg2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~2d avg2 versions, ~6d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~7d avg2 versions, ~22d avg

Compare Farmable: Farm Manager App head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Farmable: Farm Manager App, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0