Fitness Progress vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Fitness Progress's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperLucky ClanCross Forward Consulting, LLCSweatco LtdPratik StephenFitbod Inc.FitNowGymBros Inc.Appediet Information PTE. LTD
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & Fitness
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating5.0 / 54.8 / 54.5 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count4172,135379,19799,154267,881750,85968,76143,377
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateApr 12, 2024Oct 1, 2013Sep 1, 2016Nov 18, 2015Sep 26, 2015Nov 21, 2008Apr 20, 2023Aug 21, 2023
Last UpdatedMay 23, 2024Mar 25, 2026Apr 29, 2026Apr 16, 2026Apr 13, 2026Apr 29, 2026Apr 16, 2026May 19, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--positive--mixedmixed-
Score--75/100--35/10045/100-
Praises--
  • Gamified walking mechanics provide effective motivation for users to increase their daily physical activity levels
--
  • Extensive food database and barcode scanning functionality support consistent long-term weight loss tracking
  • Gamification and Motivation
-
Complaints--
  • Technical issues with step tracking and daily boost activation prevent users from earning points correctly
--
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features creates significant friction for long-time loyal users
  • Aggressive Paywalls and Pricing
  • Technical Stability and Bugs
-
Requests--
  • Clearer communication and more accessible reward options for users who have accumulated large balances
--
  • Toggle option to disable automatic calorie bonuses when syncing with external fitness wearables
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Local-only data processing ensures user privacy
  • Apple Watch integration provides high-fidelity metrics
  • Clean dashboard design reduces cognitive load
-
  • Proprietary movement-validation algorithm maintains currency integrity
  • Viral social-first brand identity lowers acquisition costs
  • High-frequency daily streak loops drive session volume
--
  • Massive 56M-item food database creates high user switching costs
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
  • Unique ranking algorithm for 500+ exercises
  • High-engagement gamification mechanics (Eggs/Quests)
  • Strong social network effects through global leaderboards
-
Weaknesses
  • Zero monetization strategy limits long-term development
  • Lack of social features reduces stickiness
  • Low review volume hinders organic discovery
-
  • Raffle-based reward system frustrates long-term users
  • Technical friction in step-tracking accuracy erodes trust
  • High ad-volume negatively impacts user experience
--
  • Premium tier gating of legacy features drives negative sentiment
  • 0.2★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific performance regressions
  • Critical technical bugs (app crashes mid-workout)
  • Aggressive and non-transparent subscription onboarding
  • Poor sentiment regarding refund and cancellation policies
-
Pricingfreefreefreemiumfreefreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemium
MomentumMaintenanceIntenseActiveIntenseIntenseActiveMaintenanceIntense
Update Cadence4 versions5 versions4 versions, ~12d avg5 versions5 versions5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~5d avg5 versions, ~5d avg5 versions

Compare Fitness Progress head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Fitness Progress, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0