Gainz vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Gainz's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Gainz
This App
Core Identity
DeveloperAmon StudioFitbod Inc.WELLTECH APPS LIMITEDFITNESS22 LTDBeachbody, LLCFitNowFitOn Inc.Enerjoy Pte. Ltd.Appediet Information PTE. LTD
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & Fitness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count0267,881130,827163,027296,626750,859282,784211,39843,377
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMar 20, 2026Sep 26, 2015Dec 21, 2018Dec 18, 2015Nov 7, 2015Nov 21, 2008Dec 4, 2018Aug 29, 2021Aug 21, 2023
Last UpdatedMay 18, 2026Apr 13, 2026May 5, 2026Apr 13, 2026Apr 21, 2026Apr 29, 2026Mar 16, 2026Apr 10, 2026May 19, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--mixed-excellentmixed-mixed-
Score--45/100-85/10035/100-45/100-
Praises--
  • Customizable workout routines allow users to adjust intensity and duration for their specific fitness needs
-
  • Extensive library of diverse workout programs keeps fitness routines fresh and prevents boredom for long-term users
  • Extensive food database and barcode scanning functionality support consistent long-term weight loss tracking
-
  • Personalized fitness plans provide clear guidance for users lacking gym experience or confidence
  • Diverse exercise library supports rehabilitation and specific physical needs like bed or chair workouts
-
Complaints--
  • Aggressive and opaque billing practices lead to unauthorized charges and difficult subscription cancellation processes
-
  • Technical instability including frequent forced logouts and synchronization errors disrupts the daily workout habit
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features creates significant friction for long-time loyal users
-
  • Aggressive paywall implementation post-update restricts access to previously free workout content
  • Poor AI instructor quality and technical glitches during guided exercise sessions
-
Requests--
  • Enhanced exercise customization including manual placement adjustments and preview options before the timer starts
-
  • Expanded library of low-impact workout programs specifically tailored for senior users and joint recovery
  • Toggle option to disable automatic calorie bonuses when syncing with external fitness wearables
-
  • Granular control over workout adjustments to accommodate specific physical injuries or limitations
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Nutrition-first integration creates higher switching costs than single-focus trackers
  • Apple HealthKit integration reduces onboarding friction for iOS users
-
  • Apple Watch biometric integration provides real-time session utility
  • Apple Health ecosystem sync reduces user-side data entry friction
  • AI-adaptive engine enables long-term progression tracking without manual input.
  • Apple Health integration creates a unified physiological data profile for workout personalization.
  • High-definition video library reduces the barrier to entry for complex lifting movements.
  • 8,000-workout library creates high switching costs for long-term users
  • Nutrition-fitness synergy increases daily app utility
  • Live heart rate integration provides real-time workout feedback
  • Massive 56M-item food database creates high user switching costs
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
-
  • Wall Pilates niche functions as a specialized entry point
  • Gamified workout sessions increase session frequency
  • Apple Health integration creates data-driven switching costs
-
Weaknesses
  • Free-only model lacks monetization levers
  • Manual performance logging creates friction compared to AI-driven competitors
  • No algorithmic progressive overload
-
  • Subscription-only model requires payment before content preview
  • Technical instability (crashes, sync failures) erodes daily active habits
  • No recovery-based readiness score despite 163K+ ratings indicating demand for advanced training metrics.
  • Subscription-only access to core AI features limits discovery for casual users.
  • Lack of social leaderboards reduces daily active usage compared to gamified competitors.
  • Frequent forced logouts disrupt daily habits
  • Lack of in-app weight progression tracking forces reliance on external tools
  • Inconsistent billing practices drive negative support sentiment
  • Premium tier gating of legacy features drives negative sentiment
  • 0.2★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific performance regressions
-
  • $69.99/year subscription tier exceeds category median
  • 0.7-star Android-iOS rating gap indicates technical debt
  • High-friction paywall triggers churn
-
Pricingfreefreemiumsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumsubscriptionfreemium
MomentumMaintenanceIntenseActiveIntenseActiveActiveIntenseSteadyIntense
Update Cadence4 versions, ~20d avg5 versions4 versions, ~14d avg5 versions5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~10d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~5d avg5 versions5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~22d avg5 versions

Compare Gainz head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Gainz, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0