gTasks for Google Tasks vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against gTasks for Google Tasks's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperJulyApps LtdMicrosoft CorporationCultured Code GmbH & Co. KGAny.DONotion Labs, IncorporatedGoogleunorderly GmbH
CategoryProductivityProductivityProductivityProductivityProductivityProductivityProductivity
PlatformAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.6 / 54.7 / 54.9 / 50.0 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count2,792260,53611,661082,80428,828157,510
PriceFreeFree$19.99FreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateApr 1, 2011Apr 19, 2017May 18, 2017Jan 12, 2015Sep 14, 2017Sep 24, 2015Apr 9, 2020
Last UpdatedOct 24, 2023Mar 9, 2026Mar 25, 2026Apr 30, 2026May 5, 2026May 4, 2026Mar 15, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedmixed-mixednegativemixed-
Score55/10045/100-65/10035/10055/100-
Praises
  • Integration with calendar and keep services provides a unified productivity experience for daily task management
  • Cross-platform synchronization between mobile and desktop environments provides a reliable task management experience
-
  • Cross-platform synchronization between mobile and desktop keeps task management consistent for power users
  • Relational database structure provides powerful organization for personal and professional knowledge management
  • Cross-device synchronization allows users to maintain a consistent note-taking habit across multiple hardware platforms
  • Simple and clean interface design facilitates quick capture of daily thoughts and important life events
-
Complaints
  • Unreliable notification delivery post-update causes users to miss time-sensitive reminders and critical task deadlines
  • Home screen widget instability and flickering post-update renders the primary task view unusable
-
  • Unexpected billing practices and subscription renewals create significant distrust among long-term users
  • Frequent app crashes and UI freezing during text editing sessions on mobile devices
  • Systematic application crashes and performance instability following the latest update disrupt the core note-taking workflow
  • Forced integration with external task management applications creates unnecessary friction and bloat for existing users
-
Requests
  • Search bar implementation to allow quick retrieval of historical tasks and specific keywords
  • Enhanced calendar integration allowing users to drag tasks directly into time-blocked slots
-
  • Granular sorting options for completed tasks would improve historical data review and organization
  • Toggle switch to disable or hide AI features from the primary interface
  • Granular text formatting options including bold, italics, and font customization are requested for better organization
  • In-note search functionality is required to locate specific keywords within long documents without manual scrolling
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Native Google Workspace integration sustains user retention
  • Minimalist interface reduces cognitive load for quick task entry
  • Offline sync ensures consistent availability
  • Deep integration with Microsoft 365 suite drives enterprise switching costs
  • Cross-platform sync maintains consistent user state across devices
-
  • Unified calendar-task interface sustains daily habit formation
  • WhatsApp integration lowers task-capture friction
  • Cross-platform sync increases user switching costs
  • Relational database engine enables complex knowledge management systems
  • Template library lowers barrier to entry for new users
  • System-level Google Workspace integration increases switching costs
  • Cross-device sync reliability sustains daily habit
  • Voice-to-text transcription reduces mobile capture friction
-
Weaknesses
  • 2-account/7-task free limit creates high churn risk
  • Absence of search bar hinders historical task management
  • Notification reliability issues erode daily habit
  • Widget instability post-update disrupts daily habit loops
  • Keyboard overlay issues degrade note-taking accessibility
-
  • Subscription billing transparency issues drive high-churn sentiment
  • Technical instability forces frequent application reinstallation
  • Subtask visibility gaps between desktop and mobile
  • Mobile app crashes during long editing sessions
  • Forced AI elements disrupt core UI
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific instability
  • Lack of in-note search forces manual scrolling
  • No native biometric security for sensitive notes
-
Pricingfreemiumfreepaidfreemiumfreemiumfreesubscription
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceIntenseActiveActiveIntenseIntense
Update Cadence5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~397d avg5 versions, ~43d avg5 versions3 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~21d avg5 versions, ~5d avg5 versions, ~10d avg5 versions

Compare gTasks for Google Tasks head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by gTasks for Google Tasks, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0