Health, Fitness & Weight Loss vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Health, Fitness & Weight Loss's closest competitors: identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

MyLifeXtended
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperH3 Apps, LLCSplend AppsM6 Software, LLCnguyen thanhBiographics Consultoria e Design LTDANaheeda MustofaClean Label ProjectJommi UG (haftungsbeschrankt)Personal Remedies, LLCHenrik Duer
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessReferenceMedicalHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessMedicalHealth & Fitness
PlatformiOSAndroid, iOSiOSiOSiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 54.6 / 52.5 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 53.0 / 51.0 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count025,320236021116
PriceFreeFree$0.99Free$0.99FreeFree$2.99$3.99Free
Release DateDec 21, 2021Jul 3, 2013Jun 7, 2011Sep 27, 2024May 4, 2019May 12, 2023Feb 12, 2026Dec 23, 2014Oct 25, 2024Dec 10, 2024
Last UpdatedMay 14, 2026Apr 15, 2026Jun 7, 2011Dec 29, 2025Aug 6, 2025May 12, 2023Apr 13, 2026Sep 1, 2016Oct 25, 2024May 19, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--mixed-------
Score--50/100-------
Praises----------
Complaints----------
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Broad 14-calculator suite provides comprehensive utility for diverse health needs
  • Cross-promotion within the H3 Apps suite increases portfolio-wide lifetime value
  • Multi-system classification (WHO/DGE) expands addressable market in DACH region
  • Offline-first architecture ensures utility in low-connectivity environments
  • Age-specific growth charts capture the parent-user segment
  • Proprietary lifestyle modeling logic provides a distinct health metric
-
  • Official TACO dataset integration provides high-trust academic accuracy
  • Dynamic calculation engine enables custom portion tracking
-
  • Science-based testing outcomes provide higher consumer trust than general nutritional data.
  • Verified product database functions as a specialized barrier against generic health apps.
-
  • Clinical credibility established by Harvard and Tufts-affiliated experts
  • Comorbidity-specific dietary mapping replaces generic advice
-
Weaknesses
  • Zero-rating status indicates a lack of user engagement or social proof
  • Manual data entry friction compared to AI-powered macro tracking rivals
  • Manual data entry creates high friction compared to automated trackers
  • Lack of long-term retention loops leads to single-use churn
  • No wearable integration limits data accuracy
  • $0.99 entry barrier limits conversion vs free incumbents
  • 13-year update stagnation erodes user trust
-
  • Manual data entry requirement creates high friction
  • Paid-upfront pricing model limits user acquisition
-
  • Manual search interface creates high friction at the shelf.
  • Lack of AI-assisted scanning limits utility compared to peers.
  • 0-rating on Android platform indicates low visibility or adoption.
-
  • Manual lookup UX creates high friction for grocery shopping
  • No barcode scanning capability
  • $3.99 price point lacks recurring value
-
Pricingfreefreemiumpaidfreepaidfreefreepaidpaidsubscription
MomentumMaintenanceIntenseZombie---MaintenanceZombie-Intense
Update Cadence1 versions5 versions1 versions---2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg4 versions-5 versions

Compare Health, Fitness & Weight Loss head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Health, Fitness & Weight Loss, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0