PencilPic - Pencil filters vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against PencilPic - Pencil filters's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperMireia Lluch OrtolaMiinu LimitedSNOW CorporationLyrebird StudioXiamen Meitu Technology Co., Ltd.Adobe Inc.HUBX
CategoryPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & Video
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating5.0 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.5 / 5
Ratings Count212,46253,886139,80478,493739,0829,356
PriceFree$3.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateApr 23, 2016Aug 3, 2011Aug 14, 2021Jan 5, 2021Feb 15, 2011Oct 9, 2009Mar 29, 2024
Last UpdatedSep 25, 2023Sep 23, 2022Apr 16, 2026Mar 27, 2026Apr 28, 2026Apr 3, 2026May 4, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentterriblepositivemixedpositivenegativemixedterrible
Score10/10075/10035/10069/10025/10045/10025/100
Praises-
  • Simple and intuitive pencil sketch filters allow users to create professional art in seconds
  • High quality photo editing tools provide professional results for casual mobile users
  • Entertainment Value
  • AI Quality
  • High-quality photo editing tools provide professional results for casual social media users
  • AI-powered photo restoration features deliver effective results for damaged or low-quality images
  • Ease of Use
  • High visual quality of generated videos provides satisfaction for users who successfully complete the process
Complaints
  • Aggressive advertising tactics disrupt the core photo editing experience for users
  • Lack of original functionality as the app relies on basic open source code
  • Lack of tracing features frustrates users who downloaded the app for specific drawing assistance
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features forces unwanted subscription costs on long-term users
  • Aggressive Monetization
  • Subscription Transparency
  • Aggressive ad frequency and intrusive full-screen pop-ups disrupt the core photo editing workflow
  • Removal of user-defined retouch templates forces manual, repetitive editing for frequent content creators
  • Pay-to-play transition gates previously free features behind subscription tiers, alienating long-term users
  • App Stability
  • Monetization Friction
  • Aggressive monetization via hidden coin costs after subscription payment creates a sense of being scammed
  • Technical failures and processing errors prevent video generation despite successful payment of subscription fees
Requests-
  • Comprehensive help documentation is needed to guide new users through the available features
  • Ad-supported access to premium features would allow casual users to utilize tools without full subscriptions
-
  • Restoration of the custom template saving feature to allow for uniform batch editing
-
  • Transparent pricing and free trial access to verify video quality before committing to a subscription
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Proprietary pencil and oil painting filter library [Feature Analysis]
  • Slider-based manual adjustment provides granular control [Feature Analysis]
  • Offline-first processing reduces server-side compute costs
  • Simple UI avoids feature bloat
  • Manual-control aesthetic appeals to traditional artists
  • AI Yearbook virality drives organic install velocity
  • All-in-one suite reduces user need for multi-app workflows
  • Massive rating volume (2.6M+) indicating high market penetration
  • Unique 'Action Figure' aesthetic differentiator
  • High ease-of-use for casual creators
  • 1000+ material library drives recurring subscription value
  • AI-powered portrait detection provides high-fidelity results
  • Multi-track video editor captures social media creator workflows
  • Adobe Firefly integration for Generative Fill
  • Creative Cloud ecosystem connectivity
  • High-quality technical imaging algorithms
  • Google Veo3 integration provides high-fidelity output
  • Drag-and-drop interface lowers creative barrier
Weaknesses
  • Aggressive ad frequency disrupts the editing workflow [User Sentiment]
  • Reliance on generic open source code implementations [User Sentiment]
  • $3.99 iOS price point exceeds category median
  • Lack of tracing features causes user friction
  • Aggressive ad-monetization disrupts session flow
  • Premium tier pricing exceeds category median
  • Restrictive export-gating triggers high-frequency churn complaints
  • Friction caused by 'pay-per-use' credit model
  • Poor subscription cancellation UI leading to 'shady' accusations
  • Lack of professional portrait retouching tools
  • Aggressive ad frequency disrupts core editing flow
  • Removal of custom template-saving forces repetitive manual work
  • Subscription gating of previously free features drives negative sentiment
  • Critical 'infinite loading' stability bugs
  • Intrusive AI UI (25% screen coverage)
  • Aggressive watermarking on free tier
  • Hidden coin costs post-subscription drive refund surges
  • Technical instability during generation causes crashes
Pricingfreefreemiumfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumsubscription
MomentumZombieMaintenanceActiveMaintenanceIntenseIntenseActive
Update Cadence4 versions5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~500d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~9d avg5 versions, ~13d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~7d avg4 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~20d avg5 versions, ~6d avg

Compare PencilPic - Pencil filters head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by PencilPic - Pencil filters, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0