Sand Apps
For individuals seeking offline-capable, multi-language reference materials for personal study, religious observance, and academic research.
Alkitab
Snapshot
Who is Sand Apps?
Providing accessible, offline-first Bible study and reference tools for global users. Enabling scripture research through multi-language support.
Target audience
Portfolio
Free 20Last updated
Alkitab
vVARY
1.2y ago
Publisher DNA
What defines Sand Apps?
Publisher DNA
Primary focus
Reference and study tools for religious and academic texts
Scale
studio
Target audience
Individuals seeking offline-capable, multi-language reference materials for personal study, religious observance, and academic research.
Signature Patterns
- •Strong emphasis on offline-first accessibility for reference content
- •Monetization model is exclusively free, focusing on user acquisition over direct revenue
- •High reliance on multi-language support to reach international audiences
- •Portfolio structure consists of many granular, single-topic reference apps
Portfolio momentum
With only 1 release in the last 6 months and 31 out of 33 apps categorized as abandoned, the publisher is currently in a maintenance phase for its top-tier titles.
Portfolio
What does Sand Apps ship?
Apps
34 apps analysed
Complete Bible Map app featuring every location mentioned in the Bible.
- The extensive library of maps provides a helpful visual reference for Bible study groups
- Persistent advertisements appearing after purchase create a negative user experience post-update
- One-time purchase model ($2.99) removes recurring subscription friction
- One-time purchase model avoids subscription fatigue
Distributed across 12 markets, strongest in Europe.
Based on 2 of 34 apps with localized market data, more coverage rolling in as scans complete · last scanned .
Americas (3)
- United States2 / 2
- Brazil1 / 2
- Mexico1 / 2
Europe (7)
- France1 / 2
- Germany1 / 2
- Italy1 / 2
- Netherlands1 / 2
- Portugal1 / 2
›+2 more europe markets
- Spain1 / 2
- Sweden1 / 2
Asia-Pacific (2)
- Japan1 / 2
- South Korea1 / 2
Core markets (2/2 apps)
User Sentiment
How do users feel about their apps?
5
Positive apps
1
Neutral / mixed
3
Negative apps
56/100
Avg sentiment score
Unlock the app dragging this portfolio down.
Access the full report for freeRivals
Who does Sand Apps compete with?
The rivals identified
Nemeses(5)
Directly overlaps with the target's multilingual Bible reference utility by offering parallel reading and audio playback.
This app serves the same offline-first Bible reading demographic as Alkitab but utilizes a smaller, faster footprint to capture users with limited device storage.
Both apps target Christians seeking scripture engagement, with 112 Bible Maps focusing on academic reference and Bible Path prioritizing daily devotional habits.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with comprehensive terminology databases, but Farlex captures the market through a free, multimedia-rich model that dwarfs the source app's static text-only library.
Fastic competes directly for the health-conscious user by combining nutrition tracking with behavioral fasting protocols, capturing the broader wellness market that Nutrition Facts targets.
Contenders(35)
Targets the same niche of religious reference users by providing bilingual, offline-accessible sacred texts.
Competes for the religious education market by providing structured guidance and reference materials.
Both apps target Bible study users with reference libraries, creating direct competition for time spent in scripture research.
It competes for the same audience by providing localized, canon-specific religious texts for specialized study groups.
Both apps target the Christian Bible study demographic, competing for daily engagement time through scripture-focused content and reference materials.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with terminology reference databases, creating direct competition for the same user base.
Both applications target medical students and professionals with comprehensive terminology databases, creating direct competition for the same user base.
It competes by targeting a specific nutritional niche, appealing to users who prioritize plant-based health and fiber intake.
Both apps target the same Christian demographic with free, offline-capable Bible study tools, creating direct competition for daily active usage.
Both apps target the same daily scripture study habit through offline-first utility, creating a direct overlap in user expectations for Bible accessibility and study tools.
Both applications target medical students and professionals by providing offline access to terminology databases. They compete directly for users seeking portable reference tools that function without an internet connection.
Both apps compete for daily active usage within the Bible study market, though they target different segments: Alkitab serves the Indonesian layperson with a free utility, while Logos targets professional researchers with academic-grade tools.
Both apps target individuals engaged in Bible study, with Logos offering a professional research library that overlaps with the reference materials provided in 112 Bible Maps + Commentaries.
It competes for the same time-share of religious study by offering advanced reading features that enhance user efficiency.
Both apps target the Bible study market by offering free, multi-translation scripture access and integrated commentary content for personal research.
Both apps target medical students and professionals at the same $2.99 price point, forcing a direct choice between raw term volume and educational utility.
Both apps target the same audience of Bible study students with free, multi-language reference libraries, creating direct competition for daily study time.
Both apps compete for the same daily active Bible study audience by offering free, ad-free scripture access. They target users seeking personal devotion tools, creating direct overlap in the scripture-reading category.
Competes for the same religious reference demographic by offering multilingual translations and audio recitation tools.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with offline-accessible terminology references, creating direct competition for users seeking vocabulary support.
Both apps compete for the same Christian study demographic, vying for daily engagement time within the Bible-focused digital tool category.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with terminology databases, creating direct competition for the same user base. Dorland’s free pricing and higher engagement metrics directly challenge the paid, stagnant model of 120,000 Medical Dictionary.
Both apps compete for the same audience of users seeking spiritual engagement, though they serve distinct use cases: deep academic study versus passive daily reminders.
Both apps target the Bible study demographic, competing for daily user attention through different engagement models: one via deep academic reference materials and the other via passive home screen interaction.
Both apps target the same Bible study demographic with free, offline-capable reading tools, creating direct competition for daily active usage.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with reference databases, but the rival captures users through a free, multi-functional model covering drugs and diseases.
This is a direct functional competitor that mirrors the core value proposition of providing a comprehensive, offline-accessible nutrition database.
This app competes for the same health-conscious demographic by focusing on the time-restricted eating aspect of nutrition management.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with offline-accessible terminology databases, creating direct competition for users seeking quick reference tools.
Both apps compete for the same daily Bible study audience by providing mobile-accessible scripture, though they operate in different regional markets. They overlap in their core utility of providing a distraction-free reading environment for personal devotion.
Both apps target the same Bible study audience and provide overlapping reference libraries and scripture engagement tools.
known for
Both apps compete for the same Bible study demographic by offering free, offline-capable scripture access, creating direct overlap in utility and user intent.
It competes by offering a data-heavy approach to health, focusing on the outcomes of nutrition rather than just the intake.
Both apps target medical students and professionals by providing specialized terminology databases, creating direct competition for the same user base.
Bible Daily competes for the same Bible study demographic by offering audio and interactive AI features that address specific feature gaps in the Alkitab experience.
Same space(35)
Shares the same category of religious reference and study, focusing on providing accessible spiritual content.
Blue Letter Bible serves the same academic study audience but provides deeper linguistic resources that act as a barrier to entry.
Bible: Scripture & Prayer targets the same study audience but differentiates through a privacy-first, local-only data architecture.
It represents the modern shift toward AI-assisted religious study, competing with traditional static encyclopedias.
It provides a more professional, subscription-backed study environment that contrasts with Alkitab's non-profit, maintenance-mode approach.
Bible.is serves the same study audience by emphasizing audio-first engagement and language-specific accessibility.
This app competes for the time and attention of serious religious students through highly specialized, structured learning tools.
It serves the broader religious ecosystem by providing high-end digital infrastructure for church-related content.
Targets users interested in religious memorization and study, overlapping with the target's reference-heavy audience.
It competes by integrating nutritional health with e-commerce, focusing on the supply side of the wellness journey.
It targets the same medical student demographic but shifts from a static reference tool to an active, quiz-based study aid.
This app serves the Tagalog-speaking demographic within Alkitab's regional market with a focused, ad-free utility.
It challenges Alkitab by integrating AI-driven insights, though its aggressive monetization creates a different user experience.
This app targets the same user base with a gamified approach to scripture knowledge, focusing on offline quiz functionality.
It competes for the same dictionary-user demographic but uses editorial content and a massive definition library to drive engagement.
Operates in the religious education space, competing for the time and attention of users seeking structured spiritual learning.
This dictionary app serves as a supplementary tool for users who need deeper definitions and context for biblical terms.
Holy Bible † Study God's Word competes for daily study time but relies on aggressive monetization that creates high user churn.
Bible Maps: Scripture Atlas is a specialized alternative that focuses specifically on the geographical component of the Source app.
This app serves the same audience by pairing nutritional tracking with professional coaching and transformation challenges.
Bible Gateway offers a broader library of translations and audio content, functioning as a high-volume alternative for daily reading.
It serves the same reference-seeking audience but adds gamification and audio, which contrasts with the static, text-only nature of the source app.
This app offers a specialized KJV reading experience that complements Alkitab's general-purpose Bible tool.
It functions as a broader health information database, acting as a supplementary resource for users who need more than just a static dictionary.
This app competes with Alkitab by adding gamification and social layers to the standard offline Bible reading experience.
e-Sword LT is a direct competitor for serious researchers, prioritizing a robust, offline-first library over the Source app's lighter feature set.
Bible Commentary Study provides a focused, offline-first library of classic commentaries similar to the Source app's core offering.
Scripture Spot provides a similar study-oriented experience by connecting verses to a wide range of historical theological resources.
known for
It competes by offering a holistic wellness experience that includes AI-driven meal tracking and personalized coaching.
Filament Bible complements physical study habits by bridging print media with digital multimedia content through page recognition.
Handy Bible Pro is a direct substitute for the Source app, offering a more advanced, multi-window interface for complex study.
This app competes by focusing on the intersection of nutritional tracking and personalized supplement programs.
It acts as a single-version alternative to Alkitab for users specifically seeking the King James Version.
This app serves as a direct alternative for users needing offline KJV access with added devotional tools.
It provides a specialized, multilingual alternative for anatomical terms, whereas the source app focuses on a broad, English-only medical database.
New entrants(6)
Enters the multilingual scripture market, directly challenging the target's value proposition of multi-language Bible access.
This newcomer targets the specific pain point of supplement management, overlapping with the target's nutritional tracking utility.
This app attempts to modernize the Bible reading experience into a social feed, contrasting with Alkitab's traditional, static interface.
Scrolls offers a modern, feed-based reading experience that contrasts with the Source app's traditional reference-tool interface.
A new entrant that challenges the target by integrating open-source food data with modern barcode scanning capabilities.
Bible Shorts provides a multimedia-heavy study experience that complements the Source app's static map and commentary content.
The Analyst's Read
The bottom line on Sand Apps
Bottom line
Sand Apps Inc. functions as a legacy reference library provider, successfully capturing a niche audience through high-utility, offline-capable tools. Their long-term viability depends on whether they can modernize their extensive, aging catalog to match the performance of their flagship titles.
Frequently asked questions
How many apps does Sand Apps publish?
What kind of apps does Sand Apps make?
What is Sand Apps's top app?
In how many countries are Sand Apps's apps available?
What fed this analysis
- Apps analyzed:
- 33
- With full intel:
- 0
- With overview:
- 33
- Website scraped:
- yes
- Social presence:
- no
