Sand Apps
For individuals seeking offline-capable, multi-language reference materials for personal study, religious observance, and academic research.
Alkitab
Snapshot
Who is Sand Apps?
Providing accessible, offline-first Bible study and reference tools for global users. Enabling scripture research through multi-language support.
Target audience
Portfolio
Free 20Last updated
Alkitab
vVARY
1.1y ago
Publisher DNA
What defines Sand Apps?
Publisher DNA
Primary focus
Reference and study tools for religious and academic texts
Scale
studio
Target audience
Individuals seeking offline-capable, multi-language reference materials for personal study, religious observance, and academic research.
Signature Patterns
- •Strong emphasis on offline-first accessibility for reference content
- •Monetization model is exclusively free, focusing on user acquisition over direct revenue
- •High reliance on multi-language support to reach international audiences
- •Portfolio structure consists of many granular, single-topic reference apps
Portfolio momentum
With only 1 release in the last 6 months and 31 out of 33 apps categorized as abandoned, the publisher is currently in a maintenance phase for its top-tier titles.
Portfolio
What does Sand Apps ship?
Apps
34 apps analysed
Complete Bible Map app featuring every location mentioned in the Bible.
- The extensive library of maps provides a helpful visual reference for Bible study groups
- Persistent advertisements appearing after purchase create a negative user experience post-update
- One-time purchase model ($2.99) removes recurring subscription friction
One-time purchase model ($2.99) creates a low-friction entry point for users avoiding subscription fatigue
- 15,000-entry database functions as a deep-research barrier for casual competitors
Distributed across 12 markets, strongest in Europe.
Based on 1 of 34 apps with localized market data, more coverage rolling in as scans complete · last scanned .
Americas (3)
- Brazil1 / 1
- Mexico1 / 1
- United States1 / 1
Europe (7)
- France1 / 1
- Germany1 / 1
- Italy1 / 1
- Netherlands1 / 1
- Portugal1 / 1
›+2 more europe markets
- Spain1 / 1
- Sweden1 / 1
Asia-Pacific (2)
- Japan1 / 1
- South Korea1 / 1
Core markets (1/1 apps)
User Sentiment
How do users feel about their apps?
5
Positive apps
1
Neutral / mixed
3
Negative apps
56/100
Avg sentiment score
Unlock the app dragging this portfolio down.
Access the full report for freeRivals
Who does Sand Apps compete with?
The rivals identified
Nemeses(5)
Directly overlaps with the target's multilingual Bible reference utility by offering parallel reading and audio playback.
This app serves as a lightweight alternative for users prioritizing offline access without advertisements.
Both apps target Christians seeking scripture engagement, with 112 Bible Maps focusing on academic reference and Bible Path prioritizing daily devotional habits.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with comprehensive terminology databases, but Farlex captures the market through a free, multimedia-rich model that dwarfs the source app's static text-only library.
Fastic competes directly for the health-conscious user base by combining nutrition tracking with behavioral fasting protocols, capturing the same audience looking for structured dietary management.
Contenders(34)
Targets the same niche of religious reference users by providing bilingual, offline-accessible sacred texts.
Competes for the religious education market by providing structured guidance and reference materials.
Both apps target individuals engaged in Bible study, with Logos offering a professional research library that overlaps with the reference materials provided in 112 Bible Maps + Commentaries.
It competes for the same audience by providing localized, canon-specific religious texts for specialized study groups.
Both apps target the Christian Bible study demographic, competing for daily engagement time through scripture-focused content and reference materials.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with terminology reference databases, creating direct competition for the same user base.
Both applications target medical students and professionals with comprehensive terminology databases, creating direct competition for the same user base.
Both apps target users seeking daily scripture study and offline access, creating direct competition for daily active usage within the Bible study category.
Both apps compete for daily scripture study time by providing offline-first Bible access and study-focused toolsets to their respective regional audiences.
Both applications target medical students and professionals by providing offline access to terminology databases. They compete directly for users seeking portable reference tools that function without an internet connection.
Both apps target the Christian devotional market with free, offline-capable Bible study tools, creating direct competition for daily active usage.
It competes for the same time-share of religious study by offering advanced reading features that enhance user efficiency.
Both apps target Bible study users with reference libraries, creating direct competition for time spent in scripture research.
Both apps target the Bible study market by offering free, multi-translation scripture access and integrated commentary content for personal research.
Both apps target medical students and professionals at the same $2.99 price point, forcing a direct choice between raw term volume and educational utility.
Both apps target the same audience of Bible study students with free, multi-language reference libraries, creating direct competition for daily study time.
Both apps target the Bible study demographic with free, offline-capable tools, creating direct competition for daily active usage among users seeking spiritual content.
MacrosFirst serves the same power-user segment that requires precise nutrient breakdown and macro-math automation.
Competes for the same religious reference demographic by offering multilingual translations and audio recitation tools.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with offline-accessible terminology references, creating direct competition for users seeking vocabulary support.
Both apps compete for the same Christian study demographic, vying for daily engagement time within the Bible-focused digital tool category.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with terminology databases, creating direct competition for the same user base. Dorland’s free pricing and higher engagement metrics directly challenge the paid, stagnant model of 120,000 Medical Dictionary.
Both apps compete for the same audience of users seeking spiritual engagement, though they serve distinct use cases: deep academic study versus passive daily reminders.
Both apps target the Bible study demographic, competing for daily user attention through different engagement models: one via deep academic reference materials and the other via passive home screen interaction.
Both apps target the Bible study market with free, offline-capable tools, creating direct competition for users seeking daily scripture engagement.
Both apps target users seeking daily scripture study and offline access, creating direct competition for daily active usage within the Bible study category.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with reference databases, but the rival captures users through a free, multi-functional model covering drugs and diseases.
STX competes by offering specialized, granular tracking for specific health markers, appealing to users who find general nutrition apps too broad.
Both apps target medical students and professionals with offline-accessible terminology databases, creating direct competition for users seeking quick reference tools.
This app competes by offering a prescriptive, diet-specific approach to nutrition tracking rather than a general-purpose database.
Both apps compete for daily engagement in the Books & Reference category by providing mobile-accessible scripture study tools to a shared user base seeking personal devotion.
Both apps target the same Bible study audience and provide overlapping reference libraries and scripture engagement tools.
Both apps target medical students and professionals by providing specialized terminology databases, creating direct competition for the same user base.
Both apps target the Bible study demographic with free, offline-capable reading tools, creating direct competition for daily active usage in the Indonesian market.
Same space(41)
Shares the same category of religious reference and study, focusing on providing accessible spiritual content.
Blue Letter Bible serves the same academic study audience but provides deeper linguistic resources that act as a barrier to entry.
It represents the modern shift toward AI-assisted religious study, competing with traditional static encyclopedias.
Bible Gateway offers a broader library of translations and audio content, functioning as a high-volume alternative for daily reading.
This app competes for the time and attention of serious religious students through highly specialized, structured learning tools.
It serves the broader religious ecosystem by providing high-end digital infrastructure for church-related content.
Targets users interested in religious memorization and study, overlapping with the target's reference-heavy audience.
It targets the same medical student demographic but shifts from a static reference tool to an active, quiz-based study aid.
This app offers a bilingual reading experience for Kiswahili and English speakers.
This app targets the same user base with a gamified approach to scripture knowledge, focusing on offline quiz functionality.
Bible: Scripture & Prayer targets the same study audience but differentiates through a privacy-first, local-only data architecture.
ESV Bible targets the same study audience with a focus on aesthetic, distraction-free reading and high-quality audio narration.
It competes for the same dictionary-user demographic but uses editorial content and a massive definition library to drive engagement.
Operates in the religious education space, competing for the time and attention of users seeking structured spiritual learning.
This dictionary app serves as a supplementary tool for users who need deeper definitions and context for biblical terms.
Holy Bible † Study God's Word competes for daily study time but relies on aggressive monetization that creates high user churn.
Bible Maps: Scripture Atlas is a specialized alternative that focuses specifically on the geographical component of the Source app.
Bible.is serves the same study audience by emphasizing audio-first engagement and language-specific accessibility.
This app occupies the same health-tracking space but adds a layer of human-led accountability and coaching.
This app provides a generalist offline Bible experience with audio and devotional content.
This app provides advanced linguistic study tools for users who want to go beyond basic reading.
This app acts as a generalist reading tool for users who prefer a single app for all document formats.
This app provides a modern English translation for users who find the KJV language difficult.
It serves the same reference-seeking audience but adds gamification and audio, which contrasts with the static, text-only nature of the source app.
This app provides a specific translation for users who prefer the New King James Version.
This app provides a multi-language alternative for users needing broader linguistic support.
This app targets users specifically looking for KJV text with visual emphasis on the words of Jesus.
It functions as a broader health information database, acting as a supplementary resource for users who need more than just a static dictionary.
e-Sword LT is a direct competitor for serious researchers, prioritizing a robust, offline-first library over the Source app's lighter feature set.
Bible Commentary Study provides a focused, offline-first library of classic commentaries similar to the Source app's core offering.
Scripture Spot provides a similar study-oriented experience by connecting verses to a wide range of historical theological resources.
This app serves as an iOS alternative for users unable to access the source app on Apple devices.
Filament Bible complements physical study habits by bridging print media with digital multimedia content through page recognition.
USANA competes by integrating nutrition tracking with a direct-to-consumer supplement ecosystem.
Handy Bible Pro is a direct substitute for the Source app, offering a more advanced, multi-window interface for complex study.
Persona relates to the target by focusing on the intersection of nutrition data and personalized wellness supplementation.
This app provides a focused KJV reading experience for users seeking daily scripture engagement.
This app offers a similar offline study experience but introduces monetization through persistent advertising.
It provides a specialized, multilingual alternative for anatomical terms, whereas the source app focuses on a broad, English-only medical database.
This app appeals to minimalists who want a distraction-free reading interface.
Foodsmart operates in the same space by linking nutritional data to actionable grocery purchasing and telenutrition.
New entrants(6)
Enters the multilingual scripture market, directly challenging the target's value proposition of multi-language Bible access.
This app targets the emerging market of users managing GLP-1 medication, requiring specialized tracking features.
Scrolls offers a modern, feed-based reading experience that contrasts with the Source app's traditional reference-tool interface.
This newcomer disrupts the space by replacing manual database lookups with an AI-driven conversational interface.
This app targets analytical users who reject social features and AI in favor of privacy.
Bible Shorts provides a multimedia-heavy study experience that complements the Source app's static map and commentary content.
The Analyst's Read
The bottom line on Sand Apps
Bottom line
Sand Apps Inc. functions as a legacy reference library provider, successfully capturing a niche audience through high-utility, offline-capable tools. Their long-term viability depends on whether they can modernize their extensive, aging catalog to match the performance of their flagship titles.
Frequently asked questions
How many apps does Sand Apps publish?
What kind of apps does Sand Apps make?
What is Sand Apps's top app?
In how many countries are Sand Apps's apps available?
What fed this analysis
- Apps analyzed:
- 33
- With full intel:
- 0
- With overview:
- 33
- Website scraped:
- yes
- Social presence:
- no
