Tripledot Studios
Get Color - Water Sort Puzzle
Snapshot
Publisher DNA
What defines Tripledot Studios?
AI intelligence is not yet available for Tripledot Studios. The portfolio data below is up to date.
Portfolio
What does Tripledot Studios ship?
Apps
32 apps analysed
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Distributed across 12 markets, strongest in Europe.
Based on 5 of 32 apps with localized market data, more coverage rolling in as scans complete · last scanned .
Americas (3)
- United States5 / 5
- Brazil2 / 5
- Mexico2 / 5
Europe (7)
- Germany3 / 5
- France2 / 5
- Italy2 / 5
- Netherlands2 / 5
- Portugal2 / 5
›+2 more europe markets
- Spain2 / 5
- Sweden2 / 5
Asia-Pacific (2)
- Japan2 / 5
- South Korea2 / 5
Core markets (5/5 apps)
User Sentiment
How do users feel about their apps?
2
Positive apps
2
Neutral / mixed
1
Negative apps
53/100
Avg sentiment score
Unlock the app dragging this portfolio down.
Access the full report for freeRivals
Who does Tripledot Studios compete with?
The rivals identified
Nemeses(4)
This app targets the same casual puzzle audience through 3D spatial logic rather than grid-based placement.
Both apps compete for the same casual puzzle audience by utilizing identical ad-supported monetization models and block-placement mechanics.
Both apps target the same casual Spades player base with offline-first, ad-supported models, creating direct competition for daily active users who prioritize simple, accessible card play.
Both apps target casual puzzle players with offline-first block-placement mechanics, creating direct competition for the same meditative, short-session user base.
Contenders(29)
Both apps target the same casual Spades player base, competing for time share through identical core card-playing loops and ad-supported monetization models.
Both apps compete for the same casual Spades player base, but Spades Stars offers a subscription-based ad-free path and social multiplayer features that directly address the primary churn drivers in Spades.
This app targets the same casual demographic by integrating haptic feedback into the standard sorting loop.
It competes for the same audience by offering a relaxing, brain-training experience with offline-first capabilities.
It targets the same adult demographic by offering a Zen-like, offline-first sorting loop for stress relief.
Competes for the same casual puzzle audience by using a nature-inspired aesthetic instead of abstract grids.
Spades+ competes for the same casual card game audience by offering live multiplayer and stable performance, directly addressing the primary churn drivers in Spades.
Both apps target the casual Spades player base, but they diverge on the core delivery mechanism: offline AI-driven play versus live social multiplayer interaction.
Both apps target the casual offline puzzle segment with grid-based mechanics, competing for the same time-constrained, meditative play sessions.
Both apps target the same casual offline-first Spades player base, competing directly on accessibility and core trick-taking mechanics.
Both apps compete for the same casual puzzle audience by offering offline-capable, grid-based block placement mechanics.
Both apps target the casual puzzle segment with offline-capable, block-placement mechanics on a grid. They compete directly for the same user base seeking short, meditative gaming sessions.
Both apps target casual puzzle players with repetitive sorting loops and offline-first architectures, creating direct competition for the same low-stakes, downtime-focused user base.
Both apps target the casual color-sorting puzzle segment, competing for the same audience seeking low-stakes, repetitive gameplay during short sessions.
Both apps target casual puzzle players with offline-first block placement mechanics, creating direct competition for short-session engagement.
Both apps compete for the same Spades player base, but the rival captures the competitive segment through live multiplayer and rule customization, while the source app focuses on offline, ad-supported casual play.
Both apps target casual puzzle players with offline-capable, block-placement mechanics, creating direct competition for short-session daily engagement.
Both apps compete for the same casual offline puzzle audience by offering identical block-placement mechanics and free-to-play models.
Both apps target casual puzzle players using identical Sudoku-inspired 9x9 grid mechanics, creating direct competition for the same user base.
Both apps target casual puzzle gamers with offline-capable block-placement mechanics, creating direct competition for session time within the same category.
Both apps target casual puzzle players using grid-based block mechanics, competing directly for the same short-session attention span.
Both apps target the same casual offline-first Spades player base and rely on ad-supported monetization, creating direct competition for user attention.
Both apps target the casual puzzle segment with 8x8 grid mechanics and free-to-play models, directly competing for the same meditative, short-session player base.
Both apps target casual puzzle players using 9x9 grid mechanics, creating direct competition for daily active users within the same casual gaming segment.
Both apps target the casual puzzle audience with offline-capable block-placement mechanics, directly competing for time-share in the same category.
Both apps target the casual puzzle segment with identical color-sorting mechanics, creating direct competition for the same user base seeking low-stakes brain training.
Both apps compete for the same casual card game audience, but Spades Masters captures the social-multiplayer segment that Spades lacks.
Both apps compete for the same Spades player base, but Spades Plus captures the social-competitive segment that Spades ignores by lacking live human multiplayer.
This app offers a similar 3D tile-matching experience that appeals to the same casual puzzle-solving demographic.
Same space(33)
This app offers a similar range of grid-based challenges, functioning as a secondary puzzle option for the same user segment.
It serves the same casual audience by using a 3D physics engine to provide a tactile sorting experience.
Appeals to the same casual demographic but differentiates through a high-fidelity visual feedback system.
This app provides a similar trick-taking experience but differentiates through auction-based bidding mechanics that increase strategic pressure.
It offers a direct alternative to the source app by bundling Spades with Bid Whist and providing live multiplayer functionality.
Provides an offline-capable sorting experience for users who prioritize accessibility over new content updates.
It targets the same casual gamers by combining color-sorting mechanics with sensory-focused design for stress relief.
It addresses the same casual puzzle market by focusing on mental exercise and stress relief through sorting.
This app challenges the source app's static AI-only model by introducing dynamic power suits that require active strategy adaptation.
Targets the niche Apple Watch puzzle market with a premium, one-time purchase model.
This app addresses the same market by providing a relaxing, logic-based sorting experience for all ages.
It captures the same casual puzzle players by focusing on sensory-driven gameplay and progression-based rewards.
This app targets the same puzzle-solving user base by adding social and competitive layers to standard grid gameplay.
Expands the sorting mechanic into a 3D hexagonal environment to capture users seeking more complex spatial logic.
It targets the same user base by emphasizing a stress-free, logic-based experience without time limits.
This app serves as a secondary solitaire option for users who enjoy the offline-first card game experience provided by the source app.
This app shares the same grid-based logic puzzle category but introduces unique mechanics that differentiate it from standard Sudoku.
It serves the same casual market with vibrant visuals and interactive mechanics that extend the standard sorting loop.
It serves the same casual puzzle segment by focusing on logical thinking and stress relief through color sorting.
This app serves the same senior and adult demographic seeking relaxing, offline-capable puzzle experiences.
This app provides a similar Sudoku-based experience, appealing to the same demographic of casual players seeking mental breaks.
Targets the same meditative puzzle-solving audience with a focus on progressive difficulty and soothing audio.
This app targets the same casual puzzle segment with a narrative-driven approach to mental stimulation.
Shifts the sorting mechanic to physics-based line drawing to attract users seeking different puzzle interactions.
This app competes for the same casual card game audience but focuses on accessibility features like extra-large card symbols to capture the senior demographic.
This app serves as a direct alternative for users seeking classic grid-based logic puzzles with customizable visual themes.
This app serves the same casual puzzle audience by providing a minimalist, pressure-free spatial logic experience.
This app competes for the same casual puzzle audience by offering a sensory-focused, visually-polished matching loop.
Targets the same casual sorting niche with a simplified interaction model for short-session play.
This app differentiates itself from the core sorting loop by adding a time-pressure delivery narrative.
This app captures the same casual puzzle audience by providing an extensive library of sorting levels.
This app targets the same puzzle-solving demographic by offering unlimited levels and offline play.
Offers an offline-first alternative for users in low-connectivity environments who prefer therapeutic soundscapes.
New entrants(2)
This app competes for the same casual puzzle audience by using a magical theme to differentiate the sorting experience.
Uses a 3D physics-based approach to retain casual players through tactile satisfaction and booster tools.
