Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Calorie Counter by fatsecret's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperfatsecretMyFitnessPal, Inc.Wombat Apps LLCNoom, Inc.WW International, Inc.FitNowGoogleYucaMyNetDiary Inc.FitOn Inc.
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & Fitness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.5 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 5
Ratings Count13,9542,316,370725,975863,3512,341,266750,859656,25191,753146,559282,784
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateDec 23, 2009Dec 8, 2009Dec 30, 2010May 9, 2013Sep 19, 2009Nov 21, 2008Oct 18, 2011Jan 9, 2017Feb 3, 2019Dec 4, 2018
Last UpdatedApr 30, 2026Apr 14, 2026Apr 8, 2026Apr 22, 2026Apr 8, 2026Apr 29, 2026Apr 24, 2026Mar 30, 2026Apr 15, 2026Mar 16, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedmixedmixednegativeexcellentmixedterriblepositive--
Score55/10045/10055/10035/10082/10035/10020/10075/100--
Praises
  • Comprehensive free feature set provides high value for calorie and macro tracking enthusiasts
  • Weight Loss Effectiveness
  • Extensive Food Database
  • Macro and net carb tracking features provide essential support for users managing keto diet goals
  • Educational daily lessons provide practical strategies for long-term weight management and healthy lifestyle changes
  • Ease of Tracking
  • Program Effectiveness
  • Extensive food database and barcode scanning functionality support consistent long-term weight loss tracking
  • Core activity tracking features provide essential health insights for long-term users
  • Barcode scanning functionality provides immediate health insights for grocery shoppers in real time
  • Ingredient breakdown and health scoring help users identify hidden toxins in common household products
  • Alternative product recommendations assist users in making healthier purchasing decisions during their shopping trips
--
Complaints
  • Search functionality regressions post-update prevent users from finding common food items in the database
  • Aggressive Monetization
  • Syncing and Data Integration Issues
  • Technical instability and blank screens following the latest update disrupt daily food logging habits
  • Forced gamification features like virtual seeds distract from the core utility of food tracking
  • UI Update Friction
  • Data & Syncing Issues
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features creates significant friction for long-time loyal users
  • Post-update instability causes frequent app crashes and blank screen errors
  • Mandatory account creation requirements frustrate users who prefer immediate access without personal data sharing
  • Inconsistent scoring logic between similar products leads to user distrust in the rating system
  • Limited product database coverage for specific regions or niche items causes search frustration
--
Requests
  • Advanced navigation features for the nutrition calendar to jump between specific dates and weeks
-
  • Expanded non-keto recipe database to support users transitioning to broader healthy eating plans
  • Customizable interface options to hide unnecessary gamification and focus on core tracking tools
-
  • Toggle option to disable automatic calorie bonuses when syncing with external fitness wearables
  • Restoration of compact and efficient design patterns for daily metric navigation
  • Dark mode interface requested to improve usability for users with light sensitivity issues
  • Customizable filtering options for nutritional stats to align with individual dietary goals
  • Expanded database coverage for non-food categories like pet products
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Professional-sync tools create a B2B distribution moat via health-provider referrals
  • Generous free-tier feature set sustains high organic install velocity
  • Massive food database (20.5M+ entries)
  • Deep integration with 40+ third-party apps and devices
  • Dominant market position (#1 Grossing in category)
  • Specialized metabolic tracking creates high switching costs
  • Community challenges drive DAU/MAU via peer-to-peer accountability
  • Psychology-based curriculum creates high switching costs
  • Clinical integration provides high-ARPU revenue stream
  • Proprietary Points® system creates a unique, non-replicable tracking experience
  • Massive trust moat with 2.3M+ ratings and 'Doctor-Recommended' status
  • First-mover in clinical GLP-1 integration for behavioral apps
  • Massive 56M-item food database creates high user switching costs
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
  • Hardware-software integration increases switching costs
  • Editors' Choice badge sustains organic install velocity
  • Proprietary scoring methodology simplifies complex data for mass-market adoption
  • Barcode scanner habit loop drives high daily session frequency
  • Independent brand positioning builds trust against corporate-backed competitors
--
Weaknesses
  • Search-index regressions in the latest release break core logging utility
  • Sensitive swipe-to-delete gestures cause frequent accidental data loss
  • Paywalled barcode scanner causing significant user backlash
  • Unreliable syncing with wearables (Garmin, steps)
  • Technical instability (frequent logouts, UI bugs)
  • Technical instability in the latest version erodes trust
  • Subscription cancellation friction drives negative sentiment
  • Forced gamification elements drive negative sentiment
  • Technical regressions cause data sync failures
  • UI friction in recent updates requiring more 'keystrokes' for core tasks
  • Barcode database inaccuracies causing user distrust
  • High-friction cancellation process leading to 'scam' complaints
  • Premium tier gating of legacy features drives negative sentiment
  • 0.2★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific performance regressions
  • Premium tier price exceeds category median
  • High-frequency synchronization failure complaints post-update
  • Mandatory account creation creates a conversion barrier for privacy-conscious users
  • Scoring inconsistencies between similar products trigger user distrust
  • Limited database coverage in non-European markets restricts global growth
--
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumfreemium
MomentumActiveMaintenanceMaintenanceActiveActiveActiveIntenseMaintenanceIntenseIntense
Update Cadence5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~7d avg4 versions, ~12d avg2 versions, ~44d avg5 versions, ~12d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~26d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~5d avg5 versions, ~6d avg5 versions, ~17d avg5 versions5 versions

Compare Calorie Counter by fatsecret head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Calorie Counter by fatsecret, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0