PingID vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against PingID's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

PingID
This App
Duo Mobile
Nemesis
Okta Verify
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperPing Identity CorporationDuo Security LLCGoogleOkta, Inc.Microsoft CorporationDashlaneBitwarden IncEntrust
CategoryProductivityBusinessUtilitiesBusinessProductivityProductivityProductivityBusiness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating2.2 / 54.9 / 54.9 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 52.4 / 5
Ratings Count3042,057,5251,084,56637,115641,284102,69125,616243
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJul 2, 2014Mar 8, 2011Sep 20, 2010Jan 6, 2012May 30, 2015May 21, 2012Sep 2, 2016Aug 5, 2010
Last UpdatedApr 16, 2026Apr 7, 2026Jan 5, 2026Apr 14, 2026May 4, 2026May 4, 2026Apr 2, 2026Apr 14, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-negativemixed-mixedpositive-negative
Score-40/10055/100-45/10075/100-35/100
Praises-
  • Simplicity and Ease of Use
  • Offline functionality allows users to generate authentication codes without active cellular or data service
-
  • Efficient and reliable multi-factor authentication process provides a secure one-stop shop for all accounts
  • Visual number matching interface removes the cognitive load of manually typing complex authentication codes
  • Cross-platform password synchronization provides a reliable and secure digital life management experience for long-term users
-
  • Reliable identity verification functionality provides secure access for office and banking services
Complaints-
  • Update and Installation Failures
  • Account Lockouts and Migration Issues
  • Account lockout risks arise when users fail to manually migrate tokens before replacing devices
-
  • Circular authentication loops occur when the app requires itself to verify a new device login
  • Account data fails to migrate when users transition to new mobile hardware devices
  • Recent account access and subscription verification errors following updates prevent users from logging into their vaults
-
  • Post-update UI regressions prevent users from interacting with essential login and consent screens
  • Authentication token refresh failures force users to manually restart the application repeatedly
Requests--
  • Cloud-based backup and synchronization of tokens to prevent permanent account loss
-
  • Manual recovery options like text-based codes are requested to break the device-locked authentication loop
  • Human-led support access for billing and account recovery issues when automated systems fail
-
  • Apple Watch integration requested to allow for faster authentication without reaching for a phone
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Identity orchestration interface justifies multi-year enterprise contracts
  • Offline-first architecture ensures access in low-connectivity environments
  • Massive install base with 2M+ ratings
  • Verified Push prevents MFA fatigue attacks
  • Native Wear OS and Apple Watch support
  • Offline TOTP generation ensures reliability in all network environments.
  • System-level Google Account integration simplifies onboarding.
  • Biometric privacy screen reinforces security-first brand authority.
-
  • System-level integration with Microsoft Entra and 365 services
  • Passwordless biometric hardware verification for secure sign-ins
  • Centralized management of personal and organizational accounts
  • Zero-knowledge architecture establishes high switching costs
  • Omnix platform secures enterprise-grade B2B distribution
  • Proactive security alerts drive ongoing retention
-
  • Specialized transaction verification for high-security financial use cases
  • Legacy infrastructure compatibility for enterprise-grade deployments
Weaknesses
  • 2.2-star iOS rating indicates high user friction
  • B2B-gated model prevents organic consumer adoption
  • 0.5★ Android-iOS rating gap suggests inconsistent platform performance
  • Broken Android update cycle (high-frequency complaint)
  • High-friction device migration/recovery process
  • Notification latency on cellular data
  • Manual token migration workflow causes high-frequency lockout complaints.
  • Synchronization errors post-update prevent third-party authentication.
  • Intrusive review prompts disrupt core authentication workflow.
-
  • Circular authentication loops on new devices
  • No clear account data migration path for hardware upgrades
  • Reliance on the app for its own authorization
  • Post-update login failures erode trust
  • Reliance on automated support bots frustrates users
  • Subscription pricing lacks a competitive free tier
-
  • Critical UI regressions post-update blocking authentication
  • Persistent token refresh failures forcing manual restarts
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap
Pricingsubscriptionfreefreefreefreesubscriptionfreemiumfree
MomentumActiveMaintenanceMaintenanceIntenseActiveActiveIntenseMaintenance
Update Cadence5 versions5 versions, ~11d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~199d avg5 versions5 versions, ~12d avg5 versions, ~5d avg5 versions2 versions, ~17d avg

Compare PingID head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by PingID, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0