| Core Identity |
| Developer | Orreco Ltd. | FLO HEALTH UK LIMITED | Apple | sandip paghadar | Elizabeth Ha | Lively Cycle, LLC | Wild Technologies AI | ZipoApps | Stephane Lizeray | Kai Oelfke |
| Category | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness | Health & Fitness |
| Platform | Android, iOS | iOS, Android | iOS | iOS, Android | Android, iOS | iOS, Android | iOS | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | Android, iOS |
| Store Metrics |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 | 2.9 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 | 4.8 / 5 |
| Ratings Count | 65 | 1,870,367 | 28 | 5 | 15 | 37,285 | 386 | 60 | 878 | 1,368 |
| Price | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | $6.99 | Free |
| Release Date | Feb 13, 2017 | Oct 3, 2015 | Jun 18, 2019 | Oct 16, 2019 | Nov 20, 2023 | Jun 13, 2023 | Dec 7, 2020 | Sep 5, 2024 | Sep 26, 2017 | Oct 9, 2023 |
| Last Updated | Jan 7, 2026 | May 12, 2026 | Dec 12, 2025 | Oct 16, 2019 | Aug 7, 2024 | May 19, 2026 | Oct 29, 2025 | Feb 19, 2026 | May 12, 2026 | Sep 14, 2025 |
| Sentiment & Reviews |
| Sentiment | mixed | negative | - | positive | positive | mixed | positive | - | positive | positive |
| Score | 65/100 | 25/100 | - | 75/100 | 75/100 | 65/100 | 85/100 | - | 75/100 | 85/100 |
| Praises | - Athletic-specific insights
| - Accurate cycle tracking and ovulation predictions provide reliable health insights for long-term users
| - | - Long-term cycle tracking utility provides consistent value for users over many years
| - Long-term reliability and accurate cycle prediction keep users engaged for over a decade
- Minimalist design and lack of intrusive advertisements improve the daily user experience
| - Long-term cycle tracking utility provides reliable health insights for users over many years
| - Scientific readiness scoring
| - | - Centralized workout data aggregation provides a comprehensive view across multiple fitness platforms
- Privacy-focused local data storage model builds trust compared to user-hostile competitors
| |
| Complaints | | - Aggressive subscription prompts and paywalls block access to basic health tracking and educational features
| - | - Widget functionality failures prevent users from viewing cycle countdowns on the home screen
| - Widget synchronization failures prevent users from viewing cycle data on their home screens
- Data backup and transfer issues cause significant frustration when switching mobile devices
| - Widget functionality failures prevent users from accessing quick cycle data on the home screen
| | - | - AI-generated workout summaries fail to accurately interpret high-intensity interval training dynamics
| |
| Requests | | - Partner integration features would allow users to share symptom data and cycle status
| - | - Reset functionality for calendar and dashboard data to manage changing life stages
| - One-time payment options requested to replace recurring subscription models for premium features
| - Reset functionality for calendar and dashboard data to allow for fresh tracking starts
| | - | - Two-way historical data synchronization to pull and push records between all platforms
| |
| Strategic Intel |
| Strengths | - Evidence-based science grounding provides professional credibility
- B2B integration with Orreco creates professional-grade utility
- Specialized athletic-only content differentiates from general trackers
| - 460 million user base drives AI-model accuracy [Metric: Total Users]
- ISO 27001/ISMS certification establishes high-level security [Mechanism: Privacy-first design]
- All-in-one lifecycle content covers puberty to perimenopause [Mechanism: Unified interface]
| - System-level integration with Apple Health provides superior data security
- Zero-friction experience eliminates third-party account creation
| - Privacy-focused security lock builds user trust
- Longitudinal data record increases switching costs
| - Local-only data storage establishes a privacy-first moat
- Minimalist interface reduces cognitive load for daily logging
- Voluntary contribution model builds high user trust
| - Lifestyle-first cycle syncing UX drives high daily engagement
- Partner-sharing feature creates a two-person social loop that increases switching costs
| - Readiness scoring backed by 450+ scientific whitepapers
- Cross-platform wearable integration (Garmin, Oura, Strava)
| - AI-powered food scanning reduces manual entry friction
- Apple Health integration ensures data portability
| - Privacy-first local storage model builds trust
- One-time purchase model avoids subscription fatigue
- Advanced power metrics provide professional-grade utility
| - Distraction-free interface sustains high user satisfaction.
- Widget integration enables one-tap logging.
- Protein-specific focus differentiates from bloated competitors.
|
| Weaknesses | - 0.21★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific regression
- Manual logging requirement creates high user friction
- No wearable integration limits real-time data accuracy
| - Historical data loss following the latest update [Metric: 1★ review frequency]
- Aggressive subscription prompts blocking basic features [Metric: Sentiment Score 25]
- Lack of responsive customer support for billing [Metric: Billing complaint volume]
| - Basic predictive algorithms lack clinical depth
- No social or partner-sharing features to drive community retention
- 2.93 rating indicates potential usability friction
| - Widget instability on Android
- Data migration failures during device transfers
- Lack of feature iteration
| - Widget synchronization failures erode daily utility
- Data migration issues cause historical record loss
- Lack of cloud-backup prevents seamless device switching
| - Widget reliability failures on the latest version
- Data migration issues during phone transfers
- Premium-tier gating of previously free features
| - High daily manual logging friction
- 14-day trial conversion barrier
- Lack of social-sync features
| - Zero monetization strategy limits development capital
- No cloud-save functionality risks user data loss
- Limited review volume hinders social proof
| - AI coaching miscategorizes high-intensity interval training
- Mandatory account registration creates onboarding friction
- Inconsistent sync with third-party platforms
| - Subscription-gated AI analysis limits free-tier utility.
- No cloud-save functionality despite user requests.
- 0.7-star rating gap between iOS and Android.
|
| Pricing | free | subscription | free | freemium | freemium | subscription | freemium | free | paid | freemium |
| Momentum | Maintenance | Active | Zombie | Maintenance | Maintenance | Steady | Maintenance | Maintenance | Active | Maintenance |
| Update Cadence | 5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~142d avg | 5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~15d avg | 1 versions | 3 versions, ~1200d avg | 5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~215d avg | 5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~12d avg | 5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~62d avg | 2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~33d avg | 5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~11d avg | 5 versions |
