Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperYucaOpen Food FactsEnvironmental Working GroupTouslesprix.comThink Dirty Inc.MyNetDiary Inc.Noom, Inc.FitNowMyFitnessPal, Inc.Fizday Tech (OPC) Private Limited
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & Fitness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.4 / 53.5 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.6 / 5
Ratings Count91,7531241,88896154,623146,559863,351750,8592,316,370362
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJan 9, 2017Jan 3, 2013Sep 18, 2013Aug 24, 2019Aug 16, 2013Feb 3, 2019May 9, 2013Nov 21, 2008Dec 8, 2009May 29, 2024
Last UpdatedMar 30, 2026Jan 7, 2026Apr 1, 2026Mar 23, 2026Apr 6, 2026Apr 15, 2026Apr 22, 2026Apr 29, 2026Apr 14, 2026Apr 21, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentpositive-----negativemixedmixed-
Score75/100-----35/10035/10045/100-
Praises
  • Barcode scanning functionality provides immediate health insights for grocery shoppers in real time
  • Ingredient breakdown and health scoring help users identify hidden toxins in common household products
  • Alternative product recommendations assist users in making healthier purchasing decisions during their shopping trips
-----
  • Educational daily lessons provide practical strategies for long-term weight management and healthy lifestyle changes
  • Extensive food database and barcode scanning functionality support consistent long-term weight loss tracking
  • Weight Loss Effectiveness
  • Extensive Food Database
-
Complaints
  • Mandatory account creation requirements frustrate users who prefer immediate access without personal data sharing
  • Inconsistent scoring logic between similar products leads to user distrust in the rating system
  • Limited product database coverage for specific regions or niche items causes search frustration
-----
  • Forced gamification features like virtual seeds distract from the core utility of food tracking
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features creates significant friction for long-time loyal users
  • Aggressive Monetization
  • Syncing and Data Integration Issues
-
Requests
  • Dark mode interface requested to improve usability for users with light sensitivity issues
  • Customizable filtering options for nutritional stats to align with individual dietary goals
  • Expanded database coverage for non-food categories like pet products
-----
  • Customizable interface options to hide unnecessary gamification and focus on core tracking tools
  • Toggle option to disable automatic calorie bonuses when syncing with external fitness wearables
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Proprietary scoring methodology simplifies complex data for mass-market adoption
  • Barcode scanner habit loop drives high daily session frequency
  • Independent brand positioning builds trust against corporate-backed competitors
  • Massive open-source database (4M+ products)
  • Science-based scoring (Nutri-Score, NOVA, Eco-Score)
  • Non-profit, high-trust status
----
  • Psychology-based curriculum creates high switching costs
  • Clinical integration provides high-ARPU revenue stream
  • Massive 56M-item food database creates high user switching costs
  • Editors' Choice badge across five markets sustains organic install velocity
  • Massive food database (20.5M+ entries)
  • Deep integration with 40+ third-party apps and devices
  • Dominant market position (#1 Grossing in category)
-
Weaknesses
  • Mandatory account creation creates a conversion barrier for privacy-conscious users
  • Scoring inconsistencies between similar products trigger user distrust
  • Limited database coverage in non-European markets restricts global growth
  • Reliance on volunteer data entry
  • Limited marketing budget
  • Utility-focused UI/UX compared to commercial rivals
----
  • Forced gamification elements drive negative sentiment
  • Technical regressions cause data sync failures
  • Premium tier gating of legacy features drives negative sentiment
  • 0.2★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific performance regressions
  • Paywalled barcode scanner causing significant user backlash
  • Unreliable syncing with wearables (Garmin, steps)
  • Technical instability (frequent logouts, UI bugs)
-
Pricingfreemiumfreefreefreemiumfreemiumfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumfreemium
MomentumMaintenance-IntenseActiveIntenseIntenseActiveActiveMaintenanceIntense
Update Cadence5 versions, ~17d avg-5 versions5 versions5 versions5 versions5 versions, ~12d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~5d avg4 versions, ~12d avg5 versions

Compare Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0